Nadene Goldfoot
Talk about cognitive dissonance! That's the state of having inconsistent thoughts, beliefs, or attitudes, especially as relating to behavioral decisions and attitude change. While on the campaign trail in Michigan for Harris, Bill rightfully defended Israel's rights of war in Gaza,, the land they presented to the Palestinians free of charge in the name of peace. Then he turned a 180 degrees against their lives by backing the 2-state solution !!!
With the implementation of the plan, IDF installations and forces were removed and over 9000 Israeli citizens living in 25 settlements were evicted. By 22 September 2005, Israel's withdrawal from the entire Gaza Strip to the 1967 Green Line, and the eviction of the four settlements in
Oslo Agreement with Arafat, Clinton and Israeli prime minister Yitzhak Rabin (left), American president Bill Clinton (middle), and Palestinian political leader Yasser Arafat (right) at the White House on September 13, 1993.
Among the notable outcomes of the Oslo Accords was the creation of the Palestinian National Authority, which was tasked with the responsibility of conducting limited Palestinian self-governance over parts of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip; and the international acknowledgement of the PLO as Israel's partner in permanent-status negotiations about any remaining issues revolving around the Israeli–Palestinian conflict. WELL, the PLO turned into something even worse, if possible, which is HAMAS Terrorism. The Palestinians voted them into power by 2006, when Hamas won the 2006 Palestinian legislative elections and assumed administrative control of Gaza Strip and West Bank. By doing this, they stuck out their tongues at the Oslo Agreement. Their meeting in 1967 in Khartoum, Africa verified how they felt with the Khartoum Agreement. No peace with Israel, No negotiation with Israel, No recognition of Israel. The famous No No NOs.
By the time Clinton left office, the peace process had run aground, and a new round of Israeli-Palestinian violence had begun. Oslo collapsed from 1996 to 2000. Why? In November 1995, Rabin was assassinated by Yigal Amir, an Israeli who opposed the Oslo Accords on religious grounds. Rabin’s murder was followed by a string of terrorist attacks by Hamas, which undermined support for the Labor Party in Israel’s May 1996 elections. New Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu hailed from the Likud Party, which had historically opposed Palestinian statehood and withdrawal from the occupied territories.
Have they negated this pledge? Have they changed? Has their relationship improved? The answer is NO No No! Yet blind people, colored by what they want, and not what is best for Israel, ignore this fact and are conniving in every way to bring pressure on Israel to bear with it and condescend to having killers live legally next door to them-in order to snuff them out better, I suppose!
PM Ehud Barak (born 1942) -[6 July 1999-7March 2001] in 2000 Camp David Summit when U.S. President Bill Clinton announced his invitation to Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak and Yasser Arafat on 5 July 2000, to come to Camp David, Maryland, in order to continue their negotiations on the Middle East peace process. I note Arafat being heavier now. The summit took place between 11 and 25 July 2000 and was an effort to end the Israeli–Palestinian conflict. The summit ended without an agreement, largely due to irreconcilable differences between Israelis and Palestinians on the status of Jerusalem. Its failure is considered one of the main triggers of the Second Intifada. The Second Intifada started on 28 September 2000, after Ariel Sharon, a Likud party candidate for Israeli Prime Minister, made a visit to the Temple Mount, also known as Al-Haram Al-Sharif, an area sacred to both Jews and Muslims, accompanied by over 1,000 security guards. Arabs will not let Jews pray on the Temple Mount, where most likely our 2nd Temple lies buried or as we believe. The Arab guards, knowing they couldn't handle 1,,000 Jewish guards, started the 2nd intifada as retribution, evidently.
Arabs surrounding Clinton have decided not to vote for either Harris or Trump, which I was thinking of doing not being happy with either one, but this actually gives the vote to Trump. One has to consider which of the two will do the most harm in the end for both sides. We're betwixt and between.
Resource:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oslo_Accords
https://history.state.gov/milestones/1993-2000/oslo
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khartoum_Resolution
No comments:
Post a Comment