How The World Is Led By Mass Thinking At United Nations Instead of Morality

 Nadene Goldfoot                                               

          United Nations Building in New York City, New York

Today, September 22nd, Erev Rosh Hashana, the day before the 1st day of our New Year, Birthday of the World, people will vote into the 193 nation of the UNITED NATIONS, the 194th country of Palestine, made up of Hamas terrorists as their leaders who had taken over years ago from the PALESTINIAN AUHORITY (PA) with Mahmoud Abbas,  the current President of the Palestinian Authority (PA). He has been in office since January 15, 2005, following the death of Yasser Arafat.  

      Golda Meir announcing the birth of Israel out of the Promised Land set aside for the British Mandate after World War I (WWI) of 30 years of care-taking.  They were led to believe that the Jewish Homeland would be larger, and actually received about 10% of the promised land; as what has since then been named "WEST BANK"  which was the ancient Jewish JUDEA AND SAMARIA..  And then there's GAZA.  GAZA was a strip that King David never did manage.  The worst enemy ancient Israel ever had were the Philistines that lived there.  After the SIX DAY WAR IN 1967 when Israel surprised itself and won,  a war of insurmountable odds against her since all her neighbors and more farther away joined Egypt like a pack of dogs after that one bone and had attacked her.  The Jews of Israel actually gave the land to their new enemy, the Palestinians, in the name of PEACE.  They gave them land right next to them and had wonderful plans for them both, but 5 minutes later, they were attacking Israel, biting the hand that was feeding them.

  Palestinian leaders that could not bring themselves to share the job and just fought.  Their land of Gaza ruled by the PA couldn't even pay their water and electric bills and Israel wound up paying for them.  Other countries donate money to them as digging tunnels is not a paying job.  In their meeting in Africa in 1967, they declared No No No;  no to having any peace with Israel.  They have topped that NOW with October 7, 2023's attack on Israel by slaughtering  at  the Nova Music Festival: At the festival near Kibbutz Re'im, 364 civilians were killed. 

• Total killed: Approximately 1,200 people were killed in the Hamas-led attack on Israel, with the figure confirmed by the Israeli government.
• Breakdown:
  • 736 Israeli civilians.
  • 379 members of Israeli security forces.
  • 79 foreign nationals. 

• Total taken: 251 people were abducted and taken hostage into the Gaza Strip by Hamas and other militant groups.
• The manner in which people were slaughtered is incomprehensible;  raped, beheaded, babies burnt and cut in half, torn apart,  killed before mothers and children, too horrific to list, leaving others with ptsd, thousands injured.  

UN knows that this is against Israel, who has been a state in the UN since May 14, 1948.  They have been fighting against the Palestinians ever since they were born. Why aren't Palestinians expected to be following a rule about being peaceful before being accepted as a state since they are known to be the attacker?   

"To become a UN member state, an applicant must be a "State" in the UN's judgment and must accept the UN Charter's obligations, be peace-loving, and be able and willing to carry them out. The application process requires the applicant to submit an application to the Secretary-General, for the Security Council to recommend admission (with no veto from permanent members), and for the General Assembly to approve with a two-thirds majority vote."  

The term "the masses" refers to the collective body of people, often used to contrast the general public with elites or smaller, more powerful groups. The concept has been explored for centuries, gaining prominence with the industrialization and urbanization of the 19th and 20th centuries, when large populations moved to cities. This phenomenon led thinkers to debate the nature of mass society and its impact, with some celebrating the potential for collective action while others warned of social leveling and mob rule.

Proponents see the masses as a potent force for progressive social change and liberation.

• A force for revolution: Political theorists and activists have viewed the masses as the primary driver of history, believing that ordinary people, or the proletariat, have the power to overthrow exploitative systems. The early 20th-century socialist magazine The Masses reflected this idea, advocating for radical social change.  Critics, however, highlight the masses' susceptibility to manipulation, conformity, and irrational behavior.
  • The tyranny of the majority: Starting with the conservative reaction to the French Revolution, critics worried that empowering the masses would lead to "mob rule" and the suppression of individual liberty. This fear warned against the "tyranny of the majority," where a dominant group could impose its will on a minority.
  • Deindividuation and mob mentality: Psychologists use the term deindividuation to explain how individuals in a crowd can lose their sense of personal identity and accountability. This phenomenon can lead people to engage in behavior they would not normally consider, a powerful factor in riots, protests, and other forms of collective unrest.
  • Vulnerability to totalitarianism: Following World War II, scholars like Hannah Arendt explored how the rise of "mass society"—characterized by alienated, isolated individuals—made populations vulnerable to totalitarian movements. The collapse of traditional community structures created a void that political demagogues could exploit through propaganda and mass mobilization.
  • The digital age has fundamentally reshaped the concept of the masses and mass communication, creating new dynamics of connection and fragmentation.
    • Democratization of information: The internet and social media have created a seemingly limitless flow of information, giving voice to countless individuals who previously lacked a platform. This has fostered citizen journalism and allowed for unprecedented levels of communication and information sharing.
    • Filter bubbles and echo chambers: Personalization algorithms and the sheer volume of online content have created "filter bubbles" and "echo chambers". This limits exposure to diverse perspectives, making it easier for people to become entrenched in their own beliefs and dismiss objective truth in favor of subjective narratives.
    • The rise of digital mobs: The anonymity of the internet has fueled a new form of mob mentality, known as "cancel culture". This phenomenon involves large groups of people using shame and public pressure to silence or de-platform those they disagree with, demonstrating a potent, and at times dangerous, form of collective online action.
    • Israel has been working ever since its creation a peace with Palestinians, with statehood having been offered multiple times to them which the Palestinians had refused.  What they really want is the total land of ancient Israel, and they are not about to get it.  A nation like Israel who believes in life and peace cannot be forced to live with a nation like a Palestine who believes in death and war.