Sunday, October 25, 2026

When The Democratic Party Was Jewish Friendly

 Nadene Goldfoot                                                 

Two girls wearing banners with the slogan "ABOLISH CHILD SLAVERY!!" in English and Yiddish. Likely taken during the May 1, 1909 labor parade in New York City.

The Democratic Party has maintained a strong, historic alliance with the American Jewish community beginning in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, solidifying under Governor Al Smith's 1928 presidential run, and becoming a core pillar of the party during Franklin D. Roosevelt's New Deal coalition in the 1930s.  
Historical Timeline of the Alliance
  • Late 19th to Early 20th Centuries: Jewish immigrants arriving in U.S. urban centers (like New York, Chicago, and Philadelphia) found local Democratic political machines welcoming and responsive to working-class and immigrant needs.
  • Polling Trends: While a majority of U.S. Jews still lean Democratic, recent polling and data show a decline in party identification—dropping from roughly 68% in 2019 to around 55%–70% depending on the specific demographic or religious subgroup (with Orthodox Jews leaning heavily Republican). 
  • Internal Debate: Jewish Democratic clubs and community leaders emphasize that the party remains a primary political home, even as debates continue over Zionism, inclusion, and safety within progressive circles.  The contemporary internal debate surrounding Jewish Americans and the Democratic Party centers on a growing tension between deeply rooted domestic alignment and rising anxiety over foreign policy and campus/political antisemitism.   

  • 1928–1936 (The New Deal): The alliance solidified under New York Governor Al Smith in 1928 and became deeply entrenched during Franklin D. Roosevelt’s New Deal in the 1930s, driven by economic relief and shared liberal values. 
  • For most of the time since 1936, roughly 70% to 75% of American Jews have consistently voted for Democratic presidential candidates according to:    the  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Jews_in_politics
  • "In United States politics, the trends of Jews have changed political positions multiple times. Many early American German-Jewish immigrants to the United States tended to be politically conservative, but the wave of Eastern European Jews, starting in the early 1880s, were generally more liberal or left-wing, and eventually became the political majority. Many of the latter moved to America having had experience in the socialist, anarchist, and communist movements as well as the Labor Bund emanating from Eastern Europe."
  • Mid-to-Late 20th Century: The party maintained strong ties through milestones like President Harry Truman's 1948 recognition of Israel, Jewish involvement in the Civil Rights Movement alongside Democrats in the 1960s, and Bill Clinton hosting the Oslo Accords in 1993.
  • Approximately 70% of American Jews have historically voted for and identified with the Democratic Party, grounded in values like civil rights, reproductive freedom, economic fairness, and the separation of church and state. However, this relationship faces a growing political reckoning and shifting trends.
  • 1960s: Jewish activists and leaders played prominent roles alongside Democrats in the Civil Rights Movement.
    • For decades, roughly 70% to 75% of American Jewish voters have consistently supported Democratic candidates.
    • In recent years—particularly following political shifts, debates over Israel policy, and rising concerns regarding antisemitism—some Jewish voters and organizations have expressed growing strain or division in their relationship with the party, while a majority still continue to lean or vote Democratic. 
    • The Squad: is an informal group of progressive and left-wing Democratic members of the U.S. House of Representatives made up of : Founding Members:  lhan Omar (MN-05);  Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (NY-14);  Ayanna Pressley (MA-07);  Rashida Tlaib (MI-13 / MI-12);  women of Muslim religion who had done everything they can to be against Israel.  Origins: The group first formed after the 2018 midterm elections, initially consisting of four freshman progressive women of color. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez coined the name "The Squad" in an Instagram post shortly after the election, Platform: They advocate for progressive policies such as Medicare for All, the Green New Deal, affordable housing, and criminal justice reform, and often operate independently or in tension with mainstream Democratic party leadership, and have influenced 3 others to join; Greg Casar (TX-35);  Summer Lee (PA-12);  Delia Ramirez (IL-03) 

  • Core Values: Many Jewish Democrats view progressive principles—such as social justice (Tikkun Olam), civil rights, and helping the vulnerable—as a direct extension of their religious and cultural traditions. 
  • Secular Constitution: Most Jewish voters strongly favor a secular state and oppose the blending of religion and government often associated with the American political right. 
    Joseph Isadore Lieberman (Feb.24, 1942-March 27, 2024 ) died at 82, was an American politician and lawyer who served as a United States senator from Connecticut from 1989 to 2013. Originally a member of the Democratic Party, he was the party's vice presidential nominee in the 2000 presidential election.  During his final term in office, he was officially listed as an Independent Democrat and caucused with and chaired committees for the Democratic Party.
  • Notable Milestones: In 2000, Senator Joe Lieberman became the first Jewish candidate on a major U.S. presidential ticket as the Democratic nominee for vice president.

  • Current Tensions: In recent years—particularly following political polarization, shifting debates over U.S. policy toward Israel, and concerns among some voters regarding antisemitism within progressive or left-leaning circles—a portion of Jewish Americans (including some Orthodox Jews and voters in regions like New York) have expressed growing alienation or increased support for the Republican Party.
    • Israel and Antisemitism Concerns: Some Jewish voters and leaders express deep concern over rising antisemitism, rhetoric concerning Israel, and the influence of progressive or socialist factions within or adjacent to the party.  
It must be remembered that Israel is basically made up of Orthodox Jews while the USA is made up of Reform Jews.  There is this difference in how they see some matters.

Polling Trends: While a majority of U.S. Jews still lean Democratic, recent polling and data show a decline in party identification—dropping from roughly 68% in 2019 to around 55%–70% depending on the specific demographic or religious subgroup (with Orthodox Jews leaning heavily Republican).  






 remains a primary political home, even as debates continue over Zionism, inclusion, and safety within progressive circles,  I notice that the program, 

Saturday, October 24, 2026

China's Views On Israel

 Nadene Goldfoot                                               


Relations between Israel and China have experienced severe strain due to differing geopolitical stances, the Gaza conflict, and growing pressure from the United States.

 China has historically been one of Israel's largest trading partners and a significant investor in Israeli tech, agriculture, and infrastructure (such as port and light rail projects). However, security screening and intense US pressure regarding Chinese influence (such as in 5G networks and ports) have heavily dampened new cooperative ventures. China is Israel's second largest trading partner globally and its largest trading partner in East Asia. Israel has traded significantly with China in technology and arms.  


The relations between the two countries have been complicated by China's support for the Palestinians and Iran, both involved in ongoing conflicts with Israel, and the geopolitical rivalry between China and the United States, Israel's primary security guarantor. In the United Nations, China has long voted in support of Palestine and against Israel. Relations deteriorated after the October 7 attacks and the subsequent Gaza war, with China classifying Israel's actions in Gaza as a genocide and calling for the "imperative" of an arms embargo on Israel in August 2025.                                   


US-China Rivalry: As Washington treats China as a primary strategic competitor, Israel's close alignment with the United States limits the depth of its economic and political pivot toward Beijing.

Two-State Solution &





 

Gaza: Beijing continues to advocate for a two-state solution based on 1967 borders and has criticized Israeli military actions and humanitarian restrictions in Gaza.  For Israel, the 1967 Six  Day War was a turning point, and meant leaving a very bad time for freedom of which they do not want to return to in connection to Gaza now.  Military action and restrictions are only brought upon by the Palestinians themselves who, since their Khartoum Conference after the 1967 War when they lost, was against Israel and any peace involved.  They want war and so they attack.  Is this so hard to understand?  It seems so.


Post-October 7 Shift: China's neutral-to-critical stance following the October 7 attacks, the most gruesome of all time that the Palestinians did to the Jews unexpectedly —alongside its positions at international bodies like the International Court of Justice (ICJ)—has largely eroded the previous perception of a pragmatic partnership.  The Palestinians made it clear that their behavior on Oct 7 was what was waiting for all of Israel and that there would be no peace whatsoever.  You know, Islam says to warn people before attacking them, and they didn't.  They hit the Jews on their happiest holiday, joyous time and many were enjoying outdoor dancing and music at the time of their bloody deaths.  It's not to be forgotten or forgiven for there was no reason for it to happen;  just out of the clear blue sky.  How the Chinese can ignore this, or any of the other European countries, for that matter, is beyond my belief.  

                  In 2017, all was good with two leaders

Failure to Condemn October 7: Israelis widely express deep disappointment and frustration that Beijing refused to condemn Hamas's October 7 attacks and instead criticized Israeli military operations in Gaza.

             China's XI meets Palestinian leader

Alignment with Iran and the Global South: Israel views China's diplomatic stance—which includes hosting Hamas delegations, defending Palestinian armed resistance at international bodies like the International Court of Justice (ICJ), and aligning closely with Iran—as hostile to Israeli security interests.

Foreign workers from China in preparations for the upcoming Chinese New Year, in the south Tel Aviv neighborhood of Neve Shanaan. February 14, 2026. (photo credit: YAEL ABAS GUISKY/FLASH90)   

Erosion of the "Economic Illusion": For years, Israel prioritized economic and technological cooperation (with China becoming a major trading partner and investor in Israeli ports, light rail, and high-tech). Israeli leadership and the public now largely view that approach as an illusion, realizing that commercial ties could not survive major geopolitical and ideological divergences,

In March 2015, Shanghai International Port Group (SIPG) won the tender to operate the northern port in Haifa, a facility being built by Ashtrom Group and Shapir Engineering.1 In July 2018, management of the first part of the new port was transferred to SIPG, which produced an unexpected backlash throughout the Israeli media.2 What could have sparked such harsh reactions? A possible explanation is that the powerful Haifa port workers’ union is the driving force behind the effort — reminiscent of the campaign waged by the Association of Contractors and Builders in December 2017, which included billboards and a Facebook page calling for the prevention of Chinese companies from penetrating the Israeli market.3

The U.S. Factor: Israel's strategic alignment remains firmly anchored to the United States. Growing U.S.–China rivalry and American pressure on Israel to purge Chinese influence from sensitive infrastructure (such as 5G networks and port operations) have further cooled official and private-sector openness to Beijing.

Reference:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/China%E2%80%93Israel_relations




Friday, October 23, 2026

October 27 Israel Elections and November 3rd USA Elections and Iran February 2028 Maybe?

 Nadene Goldfoot                                                

This plane is off an aircraft carrier of the Navy.  Everyone is practicing.  The ships are in the Strait of Hormuz (as well as nearby areas like the Gulf of Oman and Persian Gulf) amid ongoing tensions and military blockades between the U.S. and Iran.  Strait of Hormuz: U.S. Navy warships and guided-missile destroyers have been operating in and around the strait to protect merchant vessels and escort tankers through alternative southern corridors near Oman.                                                    
     Here, only 5 ships got through Strait of Hormuz in past 24 hours

Seven oil tankers were reported damaged or on fire in the Strait of Hormuz overnight, with Iran claiming responsibility for attacks and naval mines, while the U.S. and Israel weigh plans for renewed military strikes.  

Reported Ship Attacks: Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) stated that four vessels were targeted and caught fire while transiting, while three others struck sea mines.  U.S. & International Response: The U.S. military and Central Command disputed Iran's account, stating the shipping lanes are clear of mines and dismissing Tehran's claims as an attempt to drive up oil prices ahead of U.S. elections. President Donald Trump accused Iran of fabricating strikes.

Escorted Traffic: Tankers continue to move through a U.S.-protected shipping lane near the Omani coast with tracking systems turned off, though October has seen the highest concentration of shipping attacks since the war's opening weeks in March.

One thing Iran probably has counted on is being tough about the Strait of Hormuz up until this date, and it's going to be a close one, we can be sure.  This is the Mid-Term Election date for the USA.  It looks like we only have one more week to get our votes in. 

Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) says renewed attacks by the United States could prompt Tehran to invade neighbouring countries and hit bases used in US military operations as part of its new “offensive” strategy.  (However, if the USA aims at valuable sites, Iran won't be able to retaliate.  They may not think of that..)                                   

                                    One of our Israeli jets 

The warning on Wednesday came amid escalating attacks on shipping in the Strait of Hormuz, a global energy chokepoint, and uncertainty over diplomatic efforts to end the nearly eight-month war.The current conflict with Iran began on February 28, 2026, with large-scale military airstrikes launched jointly by the United States and Israel against Iranian nuclear, military, and leadership infrastructure.  Initial Strikes: The campaign opened with heavy bombardment that killed Iran's Supreme Leader, Ali Khamenei, on the first day of the attacks.  Stated Objectives: U.S. and Israeli officials initially stated the operation aimed to destroy Iran's nuclear and missile capabilities and prompt regime change. Immediate Retaliation: Iran responded quickly by launching missile and drone strikes against U.S. and Israeli assets in the region and moving to effectively close the Strait of Hormuz to shipping.  

U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth made an unannounced visit to Israel on Monday and met with Prime Minister Netanyahu at at Ovda Air Base in the south. No details of the meeting have been released. American refueling aircraft and fighter jets are also stationed at the base, and Hegseth met with the troops.

New strikes would aim to further erode Iran's economy and build on the ongoing U.S. blockade, with targets to include petrochemical facilities crucial to Iran's oil industry, one of the sources said.  The source added that striking Iranian nuclear facilities, such as those at Pickaxe Mountain, is also part of the new plans, but added there are no plans to strike civilian infrastructure like power plants.  The source emphasized that regime change in Iran, and not a negotiated deal, is the Israeli government's top goal.