Showing posts with label 1967 lines. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 1967 lines. Show all posts

Thursday, February 2, 2017

1967 Lines? Jerusalem and the United States and the People Who Backed Israel's Claim to Jerusalem

Nadene Goldfoot                                                  
USA Congress in Washington DC.
President Bush b: June 12, 1924,
President from January 20, 1989 to January 20, 1993
From Texas and a Republican with VP Danforth Quayle
In 1990, the USA Congress, under the 1st Bush, President George Herber Walker Bush, passed a resolution declaring that "Jerusalem is and should remain the capital of the State of Israel" and "must remain an undivided city in which the rights of every ethnic and religious group are protected."

President George Bush proclaimed that "The basis of our position remains that Jerusalem must never again be a divided city.  We did not approve of the status-quo before 1967;  in no way do we advocate a return to it now."
                                                                       
June 20, 1989 to August 23, 1992
Secretary of State  James Baker, born April 28, 1930 in Houston, Texas
 He was "U.S. Secretary of State and White House Chief of Staff under President George H. W. Bush. As Secretary of State, he helped oversee U.S. foreign policy during the end of the Cold War and dissolution of the Soviet Union, as well as during the Gulf War."
Secretary of State James Baker stated that "I am also very aware of the great significance Jerusalem has for the Jewish people as well as people of all religions.  Clearly, Jews and others can live where they want, east or west, and the city must remain undivided."
                                                                           
UN Embassy in Tel Aviv
The United States has never had its embassy in Jerusalem because American policy is that the final status of the city is a matter for negotiation.  A consulate is located in East Jerusalem to handle matters relating to the Palestinians living in the territories.  All other people of Israel must go to Tel Aviv for their affairs to be handled when in need of the US Consolate.
                                                                       
Golda Meir and Moshe Sharrett, Ben Gurion on left,  in 1948, Declaration of Israel as a State
It was after 1948 that the UN General Assembly voted on three resolutions calling for the internationalization of Jerusalem.  That's because the Jews had won the war started by the Palestinians who attacked the moment of declaration of the state of Israel.  Israelis won their War of Independence.
                                                                               
The matter was dropped in the UN until Israel gained control of the city of Jerusalem by this adversity upon the Jews to be attacked  in the Six Day War of 1967.   Since then, the UN, which for 19 years ignored Jordan's OCCUPATION OF JERUSALEM, has adopted numerous resolutions criticizing Israel for altering the status of Jerusalem and putting it in their rightful place as the  united capital of Israel.  This was the same position that it was under King David of Israel, founder of the city, in 1010 BCE to 970 BCE, some 3,000 years ago.  It has remained in this position as capital of the Jewish people's land of Israel and of Judah, even after being destroyed in 70 CE by the Romans.  It was unimportant to all but the Jews.
                                                                            
Arthur Goldberg, born 1908, died 1990 from Chicago, skilled in labor disputes
responsible for merger of CIO and AFL labor unions,
Under President Kennedy from 1960 to 1962 Sec of Labor,
Supreme Court Justice 1962-1965
US delegate to UN from 1965 to 1968.

Ambassador to the UN, Arthur Goldberg, drafter of  UN Resolution  242, said that, "Resolution 242 in no way refers to Jerusalem, and this omission was deliberate.  Jerusalem was a discrete matter, not linked to the West Bank." He was president of the American Jewish committee from 1968 to 1969.
                                                                               
Jerusalem before the 1967 temporary lines
In several speeches at the UN in 1967, Goldberg said, "I repeatedly stated that the armistice lines of 1948 were intended to be TEMPORARY.  This, of course, was particularly true of Jerusalem.  At no time in these many speeches did I refer to East Jerusalem as OCCUPIED TERRITORY."  Evidently former President Obama disagreed with this writer in what he was implying.  Note that Goldberg was a skilled arbiter in labor disputes.  I think he would have won this debate with Obama.

IN FACT:
                                                                     
                                                                             
After the capture of the Old City (East Jerusalem) in 1967, Israeli authorities found that hundreds of squatters had made their homes in the district.  Israeli civil engineers cleared the ruins to rebuild the quarter, but only after offering compensation or alternate housing to the squatters.
                                                                             
During Jordanian rule, the Old City was neglected.  Much of East Jerusalem lacked even the most basic municipal services.  They did not have a steady water supply, plumbing or even electricity!  As a result of reunification, these and other badly needed municipal services were extended to East Jerusalem.
                                                                             

In 1979, Jerusalem was still  home to 3 basic religions.  Judaism, Islam of people in the Old City and Christianity.  Never has their religious freedom ever been curbed under Israeli rule like it was under Jordanian rule.  A few months after Israel took control of the city, there was hysteria going around against Israel's conduct in Jerusalem towards other religions.  It was  from the Christian group of Saint Vincent de Paul of Jerusalem that repudiated these false rumors.  They said "Our work here has been made especially happy and its path smoother by the goodwill of Israeli authorities...smoother not only for ourselves, but more importantly, for the Arabs in our care.  The recent war, moreover, has revealed Israel  to us---both the soldiers and the civilians---as deserving of our deepest admiration."
                                                                       
Teddy Kollek, b: 1911 in Vienna, Austria, immigrated to Palestine in 1934.
Served as Israeli minister in Washington from 1950-1952.Director-general of Prime Minister from 1952,
Mayor of Jerusalem in 1965.  He made special efforts to promote Jewish-Arab cooperation in the city
following the reunification of Jerusalem in 1967.  
          Also in 1979, the Christian Archdeacon of Christ Church in Oxford, England, wrote:  "Jerusalem has been now for 12 years a city of freedom and friendship with free movement throughout the city and free access to the holy sites of the 3 main religions for anyone in the world....From my own personal conversations and observations, I testify that Jerusalem has never been so fairly administered, or made accessible to adherents of all three monotheism, as well as to the general tourist sightseer or visitor...as has been the undoubted achievement of Teddy Kollek and his administration.
                                                                         

By April 1990, the House of Representatives of the USA debated another resolution about Israel restating again that Jerusalem was to be the undivided capital of Israel.
                                                                         
 It was Representative Bill Emerson who praised "the spectacular track record of the  Israeli government in providing access and accommodation to Muslims, Christians and Jews who regard the city as THE HOLY PLACE IT TRULY IS."
                                                                           
 Chairman Dante Fascell of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, observed that "since Israel gained control of the Old City in 1967, it has been open to WORSHIPPERS OF ALL FAITHS."
                                                                           
President James Earl Carter, Jr. b: 10/1/1924
President from 1/20/1977 to 1/20/1981 from Georgia, Democrat.  VP was Walter Mondale
Even former President Jimmy Carter and Sunday school teacher, who later turned against Israel in his scathing books, acknowledged that religious freedom has been enhanced under Israeli rule.  He wrote: "Palestine, Peace-Not Apartheid."  " In this book Carter argues that Israel's continued control and colonization of Palestinian land have been the primary obstacles to a comprehensive peace agreement in the Middle East. That perspective, coupled with Apartheid in the titular phrase Peace Not Apartheid (which many regard as a subtitle) and allegations of errors and misstatements in the book, sparked criticism."   Before he wrote the book, he had said, "There is "no doubt" that Israel did a better job safeguarding access to the city's holy places than did Jordan.  "There is unimpeded access today, Carter noted.  "There wasn't from 1948-to 1967 under Jordan's rule."
                                                                       
State Department in Washington DC
The US State Department noted that, "throughout Israel, there are strong guarantees of freedom for all religious faiths."
                                                                           
That is because Israeli law stipulates that, "Whoever does anything that is likely to violate the freedom of access of the members of the various religions to the places sacred to them" will "be liable to imprisonment for a term of 5 years."
                                                                             
Pashtos of Pakistan and Afghanistan who are visiting in Jerusalem
Their history is that many of them rightfully claim to be descended from our Lost Ten Tribes
when Assyrians attacked Israel in 722 BCE and carted off our best of people.
Since 1967, hundred of thousands of Muslims and Christians---many from Arab countries that remain in a state of war with Israel---have come to Jerusalem to see their holy places.  Arab leaders are free to visit Jerusalem to pray if they wish to,                                                        
Al-Aksa mosque
Anwar Sadat, (1918-1981)
President of Egypt (1970-1981)
just as President Sadat did at the Al-Aksa mosque.  Muslim rights on the Temple Mount, the site of 2 major mosques, have not been infringed.

Although the Temple Mount was and still is  the holiest site in Judaism, Israel has left the Temple Mount under the control of Muslim religious authorities, which was a decision made by Moshe Dayan in the 67 war.
                                   
Donald Trump b: June 14, 1946
New President Jan.2017
6'3" tall and a billionaire-3.7 billion
business man, forte-making deals

Republican.

Harry S. Truman, b: May 8, 1884-d: Dec 26, 1972
from Missouri, Democrat-VP Alben Barkley

5'8" tall and lived with his in-laws
small business owner of Haberdashery Shop
President from 1945 to 1953
Up until Resolution 2334 that Obama had written a few days before leaving office after 8 years of serving, the United States has been most supportive of Israel and her stand with her capital, Jerusalem.  Now at a very critical point since this 2334, we have a new President with a completely different outlook as to the position of the USA in the world of affairs.  It was President Truman who brought about Israel who was president from 1945 to 1953 and it is Trump who stands behind Israel in her claim to this city.

Amazing how both these Presidents' names start with TRUM, isn't it?

Resource:  Myths and Facts-a concise Record of the Arab-Israeli conflict by Mitchell G. Bard and Joel Himelfarb
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palestine:_Peace_Not_Apartheid

Friday, January 2, 2015

Abbas's Latest Step: Accusing Israel of Alleged War Crimes

Nadene Goldfoot                                                                    
                                                                                                
Mahmoud Abbas, PA Head

This is NOT a case of the pot calling the kettle "black."  Israelis and Palestinians are opposites if ever there was two.  Israel and Palestine march to different drummers.  Israel intends to stay in Israel while Abbas intends to drive the Jews out and take over their land.  Right now Abbas intends to take Jerusalem as their capital but it happens to be Israel's capital and has always been since ancient times back to King David.  .

The first Friday (Shabbat tonight) of 2015 finds that Mahmoud Abbas, leader of the Palestine Authority/Fatah in Judea-Samaria had tried and failed to pass a mandatory Israeli withdrawal to pre-1967 lines at the UN Security Council. 
                                                                 

                                                                           
Netanyahu and Obama Talking about 1967 lines on TV
 President Obama did not understand the meaning of this line either, and had tried to get Netanyahu to go back, on television yet on May 20, 2011.   Netanyahu had to give him a lecture on why Israel could not do this, but I see that Abbas tried anyway.  " Friday, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, for a second timerejected the 1967 borders as "indefensible" during a meeting that he and President Obama just concluded in the Oval Office."  What this means is to expect that "the outcome of final status negotiations will be a full and complete return to the armistice lines of 1949,” another way of describing the 1967 boundaries."  

After having been attacked a few minutes after announcing statehood in 1948 and fending for their lives in the War of Independence which started on November 29, 1947 when the Arabs became violent upon hearing the UN resolution on Palestine, giving them their own state out of Israel's reduced by 80% piece, and wasn't over until Armistice Agreements were signed in 1949, Israel has had to deal with the Sinai War and the Six-Day War plus the War of Attrition from 1968 to 1970.  Then there was the Yom Kippur War of 1973 as well as many other attacks.  No, Israel is not going to go back to the pre-1967 lines which were just temporary anyway.   If the USA had to do that, they'd have to give back many states to Mexico, and maybe even Oregon and Washington to Canada.  Most wars are over land, and Israel fought for their lives over Israel which was awarded to them after years of meetings with the Allied forces who won WWI.  They had come into the Ottoman Empire who had lost the land.  By winning they had the right to divvy up the land, and decided to give Palestine to the Jews who had no land of their own.  
                                                                     
ICC in Netherlands
The day after this attempt and finding that it didn't pass, Abbas signed a Palestinian request to join the International Criminal Court.  He wants to bring the leaders of Israel before the court for alleged war crimes; obviously from Operation  Defensive Edge when Israel had to go into Gaza to stop the rockets, mortars and missiles as well as tunnels from Hamas' attack on them.

Can it be that Abbas doesn't see that the Palestinians have been the ones who have been the aggressors and have been attacking Israel in this manner since 2001?  Of course they have been attacking Israel in many ways since 1948 in an on-going war against Israel; more interested in attacking than in ever creating their own homeland and living in security.  To throw aspersions onto Israel when his own slate is cluttered with sins takes chutzpa.  I'm Jewish, but this comment from the New Testament comes to my mind:  "The "let he who is without sincast the first stone" incident is one of the most well-known lessons of the Bible.   Our Torah has  this to say to someone like Abbas.  Willful sinners have heaped false accusations upon me, but I keep YOUR precepts wholeheartedly, something RASHI commented on.  
                                                                     
The Palestinians should be fearing this international criminal court as they are the criminals.  Israel has only been defending their lives.  I would have Professor Eugene Kontorovich as my defense attorney for Israel who is a great international law lawyer.  "He is one of the world’s preeminent experts on international jurisdiction and criminal law, ... He is working on a book on international law for Harvard University Press. "  I would have several lawyers working together to defend Israel if it comes to that such as including International lawyers such as Eugene Rostow, Julius Stone, David Phillips, and  Alan Dershowitz   Israel has been defending the lives of their citizens, not being aggressive.  They have the right to defend themselves.  This tiny country has gone out of its way to preserve the lives of the Palestinians, and it is not their fault that these people would rather sacrifice their own lives in order to give Israel a bad rep.  

"The International Criminal Court (ICC or ICCt)  is an intergovernmental organization and international tribunal that sits in The Hague in the Netherlands. The ICC has the jurisdiction to prosecute individuals for the international crimes of genocidecrimes against humanity, and war crimes."

122 states are members.  They have to  sign and ratify the Rome statute.  Is Palestine an actual state now?  They're so busy attacking Israel through the UN that they don't seem to be running their state.  "Israel, Sudan and the United States—have informed the UN Secretary General that they no longer intend to become states parties and, as such, have no legal obligations arising from their former representatives' signature of the Statute.  

I believe Israel has the right to sue the Palestinians.  Article 6 defines the crime of genocide as "acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group"  They have been trying to do away with Jews living in Israel since before 1948.  They have attacked to kill.  

"There are five such acts which constitute crimes of genocide under article 6:
  1. Killing members of a group (bombing them with mortars, rockets, missiles) 
  2. Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group
  3. Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction
  4. Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group
  5. Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group
The definition of these crimes is identical to those contained within the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide of 1948."  Operation Defensive Edge was Israel's decision when all of Israel were in bomb shelters.  The attacks on Israel  pre-operation had been unbearable.  Netanyahu will answer with :“Hamas is committing a double war crime by intentionally trying to hit Israeli citizens, and using the local Gaza population as human shields,” adding that Hamas thus bears responsibility for civilian casualties in the conflict."

The Palestinians made the mistake of not accepting land in 1947 

when it was offered to them by Great Britain. They've made the 

mistake of not accepting Israel as a Jewish state and instead 

attacking Israel at every opportunity.   They're making the mistake 

of joining the criminal court to bring charges against Israel.  People 

that live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones, Abbas.  

Resource:  http://www.debka.com/newsupdate/10060/
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/20/world/middleeast/20mideast.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Criminal_Court
http://www.thewire.com/global/2011/05/what-obama-meant-1967-lines-why-irked-netanyahu/37977/
http://www.jnf.org/about-jnf/in-your-area/speakers/eugene-kontorovich.html
http://www.law.northwestern.edu/faculty/profiles/EugeneKontorovich/
http://int.icej.org/news/headlines/netanyahu-defends-operation-defensive-edge
 Reference: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ub2x5UvjUs4  Prof. Kontorovich