Showing posts with label debate. Show all posts
Showing posts with label debate. Show all posts

Friday, August 7, 2026

Mike Rogers, Republican Running Against Abdul El-Sayed of Michigan

 Nadene Goldfoot                                                    

                              Michael J. Rogers in 2007, as a US Representative 

                                                                                        

19 years later, we see Mike as running for a Senator position,

Our Republican candidate for a Senator position is Michael J. Rogers, who will be facing  the Democrat's Abdul El-Sayed, a man backed by George Soros and his money,  in the General Election on November 3, 2026.  

Michael J. Rogers was born on June 2, 1963, making him 63 years old.  
Rogers was born in Livonia, Michigan, the son of Joyce A. and John C. Rogers, and spent his early years in neighboring Redford Township His family moved to Brighton Township in Livingston County, where he graduated from Howell High School in 1981. He graduated from Adrian College in 1985 with a bachelor's degree in criminal justice and sociology. Rogers served in the United States Army from 1985 to 1989. Rogers is on Telefonica's Technical and Security Advisory Committee and a board member of IP3 International.

From 1989 to 1994, Rogers worked as a special agent with the Federal Bureau of Investigation in its Chicago office, specializing in organized crime and public corruption. He is a member of the Society of Former Special Agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation. In 2017, Rogers was interviewed to be director of the FBI after James Comey was dismissed,

Rogers is an American law enforcement officer and politician who served from 2001 to 2015 as the U.S. representative for Michigan's 8th congressional district. A member of the Republican Party, he chaired the United States House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence from 2011 to 2015.  Rogers was the Republican nominee in the 2024 United States Senate election in Michigan and narrowly lost to Elissa Slotkin.  He doesn't give up on  a goal.  

In August 2023, Rogers announced his candidacy for the U.S. Senate to succeed the retiring Democrat Debbie Stabenow. He won the Republican primary with over 60% of the vote on August 6, 2024, and was the Republican nominee in the general election. He lost to Democratic nominee Elissa Slotkin in the general election by fewer than 20,000 votes, while Donald Trump won the state in the concurrent presidential election by just over 80,000 votes.

By April 14, 2025, Rogers announced his candidacy for his state's other U.S. Senate seat. He won the Republican primary on August 4, 2026, and will face Democratic nominee Abdul El-Sayed in the general election on November 3, 2026,

Rogers is strongly pro-Israel. In July 2025, he said of opposition to Israel's conduct in the Gaza war, "it is very short-sighted and politically naive to walk in and say we're not going to allow Israel to defend itself.

Since he seems to be a man of few words, I found what his party stands for:  The Republican Party is traditionally and widely considered the more staunchly pro-Israel major U.S. political party. 

  • Strategic Alliance: The party strongly views Israel as a core democratic ally in the Middle East and vital to U.S. strategic interests. 
  • Base Support: White evangelical Christians, a major component of the GOP base, strongly support Israel for religious and theological reasons. I believe that's because they use the "Old Testament" more than other Christians do, as examples of their spirit.  
  • Policy Actions: The party has historically championed moves like moving the U.S. Embassy to Jerusalem and supporting strong military aid packages to Israel.
  • Emerging Nuances: While congressional leadership remains firmly pro-Israel, parts of the newer "America First" and isolationist factions—particularly among some younger conservatives—have questioned unconditional foreign aid and deep foreign entanglements, reflecting minor emerging debates within the broader conservative movement.                           

  •    That's all right !  As a senior, I would love to try to debate with them.  Maybe my son even might join me, a champion debator who went to state here in Oregon from his high school.  As a teacher, I want young people to look at both sides of a position and not just one, one station, one reference only.  I was born to this reality before Israel was even created  and have been following it forever.  I've been hearing from both sides.  I know the value system of my side and the value system used on the opposing side, and believe me;  it is different, even though it may be true that a "people hurt hurt people" which is a Sayed saying that he has used.  No one, including Palestinians, have ever been hurt more in this world than Jews have, and they are not trying to hurt others.  On the contrary, we chose to teach that you do NOT do unto others that which you do not want to have done to you.  Its's original and the negative of the Christian saying, if you notice.    
  • I cannot say this for the Democratic party anymore.  They manage to blame all their  problems onto Jews, Israel, both.  We've been the scapegoats of the world in every generation except a very few, I've found.  Even our own Jewish brethran hold so many that are now Hellenized Jews that I can't count us anymore correctly.  We're losing traction:  
  • Older and younger Republicans also diverge in their views of US support for Israel, largely mirroring the differences between MAGA supporters and non-MAGA Republicans. This is in part because of the significant overlap between the groups: 71 percent of Silent Generation, Baby Boomer, or Gen X Republicans consider themselves supporters of the MAGA movement, compared to 59 percent of Millennial or Gen Z Republicans.
  • The MAGA movement, derived from Donald Trump's "Make America Great Again" slogan, is a right-wing populist and national-conservative political movement in the United States. Centered around Trump, it reshaped the Republican Party and American politics by emphasizing an "America First" agenda.  So we're losing ground within our own party while the youngsters are backing others.  Let's hope that well-worked debates clear the air quality.  
  • Resource;
  • Brookings
  • Encyclopedia Brittanica
  • Cambridge University Press
  • facebook
  • CBS News 

Saturday, May 24, 2025

Is Donald Trump, USA President, Good For The Jews?

 Nadene Goldfoot                                               

On May 14, 2025, the question of whether or not Donald Trump is good for the Jews was discussed in the Sapir Debates held in New York City. 

Rahm Israel Emanuel born November 29, 1959) age 66 is an American politician and diplomat who most recently served as United States ambassador to Japan from 2022 to 2025.  Emanuel's father, Benjamin M. Emanuel, was born in Jerusalem, where he was a member of the Irgun paramilitary organization. He moved to the United States to work as a pediatrician at Michael Reese Hospital. The surname Emanuel (Hebrewעמנואל), which means "God is with us", was adopted by their family in memory of Rahm's uncle (his father's brother) Emanuel Auerbach, who was killed in 1933 by Arabs in Jerusalem.  His first name, Rahm (רם‎) means high or lofty in Hebrew.  

In June 2007, Emanuel condemned an outbreak of Palestinian violence in the Gaza Strip and criticized Arab countries for not applying the same kind of pressure on the Palestinians as they have on Israel. At a 2003 pro-Israel rally in Chicago, Emanuel told the marchers that Israel was "ready for peace" but would not get there until Palestinians "turn away from the path of terror".  Interesting as they chose for 2023- exactly 20 years later, the worst path of terror a human could conceive.  

Jason Dov Greenblatt
 (born March 30, 1967) age 58 is an American lawyer. He was the executive vice president and chief legal officer to Donald Trump and The Trump Organization, and his advisor on Israel.  I always thought it was Trump's son in law, Jared Kushner. 
Greenblatt is an Orthodox Jew, and lives in Teaneck, New Jersey, with his wife and six children, the eldest three of which are triplets. His wife, Naomi Greenblatt, is a psychiatrist.  Greenblatt is the son of Hungarian Jewish refugees, and grew up in Forest Hills, QueensNew York City. During World War II, his father fled Szatmárcseke in 1941 as a child, while his mother hid in Budapest with her family during the Nazi occupation, and fled to the United States after the Hungarian Revolution in 1956.

 Bret Louis Stephens (born November 21, 1973) age 52  is an American conservative columnist, and journalist. He has been an opinion columnist for The New York Times and a senior contributor to NBC News since 2017. Since 2021, he has been the inaugural editor-in-chief of SAPIR: A Journal of Jewish Conversations.  Both his parents were secular Jews. His mother was born in Italy at the start of World War II to Jewish parents who had fled Nazi Germany. His paternal grandfather, Louis Ehrlich, was born in 1901 in Kishinev (today ChișinăuMoldova). 

 The debate was between Jason Greenblatt who thought he was good for the Jews, and had  served as Trump’s Special Envoy to the Middle East and worked for him for 20 years, and  Rahm Emanuel, former mayor of Chicago and former chief of staff to President Obama, and US Ambassador to Japan. who said he was not. It became praising Trump and Obama.  

Moderated by SAPIR Editor-in-Chief Bret Stephens, this is a timely, unsparing exchange on identity, power, politics — and what it means to stand with the Jews in America today. During the 2016 United States presidential election campaign, Stephens became part of the Stop Trump movement, regularly writing articles for The Wall Street Journal opposing Donald Trump's candidacy and becoming "one of Trump's most outspoken conservative critics". Stephens has compared Trump to Italian dictator Benito Mussolini. After Trump was elected, Stephens continued to oppose him: in February 2017, Stephens gave the Daniel Pearl Memorial Lecture at the University of California, Los Angeles, and used the platform to denounce Trump's attacks on the media. His opposition to Trump continued after he moved to the Times. For instance, in 2018 he argued that by the same logic Republicans used to justify the impeachment of Bill Clinton, they should impeach Trump.                            

    PM Netanyahu and Donald Trump

They were given 4 minutes each to start with, then 3 minutes of rebuttal.  I didn't even realize they had started;   thought they were just chatting about the discussion, and I've been a judge in real debates at a high school.                            

    Trump and first wife in Russia when young

Trump at Wailing Wall in Israel

I thought Jason was very clear in his defense and why, but couldn't put my finger on Rahm's reasons why not, though he did speak fast, and I am old.  On debating, I'd give Jason the medal.  Actually, I think Trump has done much for Israel, more than any other president. 

I found out that the BBC cuts off Jason but the Hungarians are worse than Al Jazeera is in cutting anything he says.   They brought up Charlottesville and the Universities in their allowing anti-Semitism.   The also brought up politics with Iran and the missiles raining on Israel from them.  

So here I go.  From what I know, Israelis appreciate Trump very much.  I never did think Obama was really for Israel or Netanyahu at all, especially when he and his contingent went to Washington and had to go through the back door as I remember.  I think they were snubbed and I wondered what they'd do for dinner.  It was a bad scene.  

A town was named for Trump in Israel, showing how much they appreciated him, for he had okayed the capital as Jerusalem and had the Embassy building moved there when other presidents alluded to doing it but never did.  It showed this was a change from Democrats to Republicans backing Israel which was a shock.  Trump started the Abraham Accords and was there to sign on. 

 They spoke of the college campuses and its anti-Semitic acts.  Also Josh Shapiro thought that Biden's vice president didn't want him running with her for fear that his being Jewish would hold her back.  There is anti-Semitism in both the Democrat and Republican parties that each was aware of.  Obama evidently legitimatized some of it. 

Rahm remembered the Houthis being bombed by USA over the ships which caused them to shoot missiles at Israel;  and USA did nothing to help.  He also brought up the tariff Trump was charging Israel and said that right now Israel is in bad shape economically, so its a bad time for a tariff, but I remember Netanyahu expressing immediately that they would certainly pay it.  He was happy that Trump got out Alexander, the American/Israeli from Hamas. The worst thing was Trump's letter to Harvard that did not mention once, (anti-Semitism) in the acts happening there.  It was more of a politically speaking letter. Greenblatt still was in a thankful mood toward what the USA had done for Jews in allowing to enter and experience freedom that they had not been able to have from any other country.     

There are orthodox rabbis in the states backing Trump for religious reasoning.  A large Christian group in the USA also backs Israel. 

Most all my family and friends are Democrats and are against Trump. Jews go back to Democrat Roosevelt believing he had something to do with their being allowed entry after the door closed on most in the 20s.  When you are conflicted like so many of us that could be on this question, you are experiencing cognitive dissonance.  Read Steve Henwood's videos about that and how to resolve it.  

Resource:

https://www.92ny.org/event/sapir-debates-is-donald-trump-good-for-the-jews

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bret_Stephens

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jason_Greenblatt

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rahm_Emanuel

https://www.jewishpress.com/sections/features/is-trump-good-for-the-jews-notes-from-a-spirited-debate/2025/05/22/

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCc6qikfnH-H4UVsOSM9j17Q


Friday, February 28, 2025

So This Was A Peace Meeting?

 Nadene Goldfoot                                         


Get ready, debaters;  this is what you should not do.  Just watch CNN's presentation of Trump, Vance and Zelensky in their meeting seen today, Friday, the last day of February, the 28th!!!  This is how one of the viewers saw the three men discuss the dire situation Zelensky is in with Russia; with a President who trusts the word of Russia only because he hasn't blown that trust YET with Trump.  Zelensky was telling how how many times that trust was broken with himself.  

It was down to Zelensky explaining how Putin's Russia had been taking over Ukraine, including his explanation of dates and places, and all of a sudden Vance interrupted and quickly berating Zelensky for not saying THANK YOU to Trump for all of the USA's help.  

Zelensky could not get a word in.  Trump yelled and yelled along with Vance at Zelensky.

It all happened very fast.  This is my memory of something just a few minutes ago of my 90 1/2 year old mind.  Oy Vey!  

Further, already others have commented.  
Mr. Vance told Mr. Zelensky that it was “disrespectful” for him to come to the Oval Office and make his case in front of the news media, while Mr. Trump told the Ukrainian leader, “You’re not really in a good position right now.” Mr. Trump added, “You’re gambling with World War III.”

PS: "Forward mentioned this:  So was this about performative acts of gratitude, or something else? A week ago, remember, the Trump administration demanded that Israel vote against a U.N. resolution holding Russia responsible for the war. Israel complied, joining the dubious company of North Korea, Belarus, Hungary and Russia. The spectacle of a Jewish nation being forced into a kind of historical revisionism — as Jews around the world fight a constant battle against the forces of Holocaust denial — made the episode even more painful."  My comment is that I am shocked!  We all know that Russia invaded, and no one has good reason in invading another's country. That's no peaceful discussion about any situation!!! 

Update:  Whatever happened to lunch?  Was Zelensky kicked out without the promised meal?  

Resource:

https://www.nytimes.com/live/2025/02/28/us/trump-news 

https://www.forbes.com/sites/mollybohannon/2025/02/28/trump-zelenskyy-vance-face-off-in-oval-office-shouting-match-heres-everything-they-said/  Excellent with written wording of each.


Saturday, September 2, 2023

Roger Fisher, The Man Starting The Case For and the Case Against Israel

 Nadene Goldfoot                                           

Harvard lawyer Roger Drummon Fisher,(1922-2012 Illinois, lawyer), son of Walter Taylor Fisher (1892-1991 b:Chicago, lawyer)  and Katherine Drummon Fisher;  son of Walter Lowrie Fisher (1862-1935  lawyer)   in Wheeling, Ohio, West Virginia .  Three generations of lawyers. 

PBS had this program called  "The Advocates" on Sunday evenings.  The American Friends Service Committee, a Quaker group that had shown considerable bias against Israel, had offered this idea.  Roger Fisher(May 28, 1922-August 25, 2012)  was also a Harvard Law Professor but who supported the Arab side of the conflict with Israel.  He was all for the Palestinians.  Roger was the founder and executive producer of the program.  

Alan Dershowitz (September 1, 1938)  was up against Roger Fisher  on a PBS Show in Los Angeles with a live audience in 1970 when he was a young Harvard Law professor. From 1964 to 2013, he taught at Harvard Law School, where he was appointed as the Felix Frankfurter Professor of Law in 1993.  He's an authority on the American Constitution.  
Palestinian refugees in 1967  
Newly digitized archive photos from the UN agency UNRWA provide a visual insight into the lives of early Palestinian refugees. They were created in two main waves - from the Middle East war of 1948, and in 1967 when Israel occupied the West Bank, Gaza Strip and East Jerusalem

Dershowitz had his first visit of Israel before the show, visiting the Gaza Strip.  Dershowitz says he found himself sympathetic to the Arabs of the West Bank and Gaza and families of 1948 that were separated then and those also in 1967.  He was there for several weeks, but came back with pride for Israel and ready for the debate. He was Israel's lead lawyer in the court of public opinion.  

           Ten years later after PBS's The Advocates:  In my living room in Safed in 1980  sitting on a single bed waiting for my lift to arrive at the port with our furniture.  The only window has bars on it because we were on a first floor and terrorists could enter without them.  I made arrangements from eastern Oregon's Ontario where we lived for housing and a 10 month re-training program to teach English in Israel.  We even took our female German shepherd with us.  We gave up a beautiful home and had never visited Israel before, but I had done a lot of reading; so much so that I had to make aliyah.  

I didn't just visit Israel for a couple of weeks.  I lived there for over 5 years before returning to the states from September 1980 to November 23, 1985.  My first 10 months were at a school studying Hebrew 6 days a week, then teaching in a junior high our English language.  We saw as much as we could during those 5 years.  I gave blood and in return I would get blood if needed.  I learned to shoot an A1 rifle and work with Israelis who drove around, spotters of trouble.  My German shepherd who also immigrated with me was with me during these drives and the most favorite on these drives. I voted in an election.   I shopped in supermarkets, took walks, bought a car, wrote plays and then produced them, acting as well in them.  We had started "Yiddish Theater in English." and Safed was our home where we did all this.  I scratch my head trying to figure out how these Quakers came up with such a taste of Israel--and in 2 weeks.  

Fisher started the debate stating that the American Friends found blame enough for all in their visit.  He went on with "There are no devils and no angels in the Middle East. " Then Fisher stated that he had 4 things that Israel should be doing.   (I can tell right away that those viewing what they were taken to see had no military background to know what to look for.) 

They believed the US should urge Israel to use military leverage.  Here was what he then stated.  

1. Allow Palestinian refugees into the West Bank and Israel itself.  

2. Israel should withdraw its forces as part of package settlement.  

3. Israel should abandon the policy of escalatory retaliation-2 eyes for an eye.

4. Israel should sit down with indirect talks, not insisting that the 1st talks be face to face.  

Then he trusted President Nasser and King Hussein to be his key witnesses.  Nasser began with a straight-out lie, ignoring the 3 No's at Khartoum:   I take it Fisher used quotes from these men.  They wouldn't have been a part of this live show.  That means that Fisher is the one who did the research was ignoring the Khartoum decisions that the Arabs were not ignoring.  They were following it quite well with loud and emphatic No, No, No!.

Quaker activists' work in March 2019.  Quaker schools are fertile ground for BDS and have become ground zero when it comes to pro-BDS faculty and students. The Quaker tradition of even-handedness and political neutrality has long passed; by the late 1970s the American Friends Service Committee (AFSC) had effectively enshrined Palestinians as the “new Jews.” Support for Palestinian terror as “resistance” against Israel’s “structural violence” and against sanctions on Iran’s nuclear program is now customary.

In 2018, Israel revealed their list of 20 social justice groups from around the world it was henceforth banning from the country because of their support for the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement. A rabbi on their staff– the American Friends Service Committee (AFSC) was taken by surprise.  How can they attack Israel with the BDS yet had helped Jewish refugees after 1938?  It happens that today, BDS is as bad as bullets are.  

Dershowitz reminded Fisher that when Arabs speak to Arabs they say one thing, but while they speak to the West, they say another thing.  To his people, Hussein of Jordan said, "Kill the Jews wherever you find them.  Kill them with your hands, with your nails, with your teeth."  (That, coming from the more placid of Arab leaders-and it was quite brutal !)  Well, you know he wouldn't let the West know how he felt. 

We find that Palestinian Qassam rocket firings increase sharply on the day following the killing of Palestinians by Israel. In addition, we show that the probability of Palestinian killings of Israelis (although not the number of people killed) increases following the killing of Palestinians by Israel. Thus, it appears that Palestinian violence does contain an element of retaliation, and that Israeli military operations against Palestinians lead to escalation rather than incapacitation. Consistent with previous analyses, we confirm that Israeli aggression, too, contains an element of retaliation, in that Israel is more likely to kill Palestinians on days following killings of Israelis by Palestinians. Together, these findings suggest that, contrary to previous analyses that characterized Israeli violence alone as retaliatory, the dynamics of retaliation in the Second Intifada are bidirectional. From PNAS (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (often abbreviated PNAS or PNAS USA) is a peer-reviewed multidisciplinary scientific journal.
During the May 2021 conflict in GazaHamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad fired over 4,300 rockets at Israeli civilians. In August 2022, Palestinian Islamic Jihad fired over 1,100 rockets at Israelis during the three-day escalation, according to the Israel Defense Forces.May 13, 2023
May 15, 2023, I published this:  After 5 days of fighting, Israel agreed to a truce with the Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ) early Sunday morning. In total, 1,139 rockets were fired into Israel and over 430 were intercepted. Most of the rest fell in open areas. The Iron Dome had a 95% success rate. The IDF struck 422 PIJ targets and eliminated at least 4 high ranking PIJ commanders. One Israeli woman and one Palestinian laborer were killed by the rocket fire. Over a dozen Israelis were injured. [Can you imagine the US agreeing to a truce with Al Qaida or ISIS?]
Intifada, also spelled intifadah, Arabic intifāḍah (“shaking off”), either of two popular uprisings of Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza Strip aimed at ending Israel's occupation of those territories and creating an independent Palestinian state.  However, when a meeting is scheduled, the Palestinians do not show up.                                

The First Intifada or First Palestinian Intifada, also known simply as the intifada or the intifadah, was a sustained series of protests and violent riots carried out by Palestinians in the Palestinian Territories and Israel. It was motivated by collective Palestinian frustration over Israel's military occupation of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, as it approached a twenty-year mark, having begun after Israel's victory in the 1967 Arab–Israeli War. The uprising lasted from December 1987 until the Madrid Conference of 1991, though some date its conclusion to 1993, with the signing of the Oslo Accords.                          

The Second Intifada  was a major Palestinian uprising against Israel. The general triggers for the unrest are speculated to have been centred on the failure of the 2000 Camp David Summit, which was expected to reach a final agreement on the Israeli–Palestinian peace process in July 2000. Outbreaks of violence began in September 2000, after Ariel Sharon, then the Israeli opposition leader, made a provocative visit to the Al-Aqsa compound on the Temple Mount in Jerusalem; the visit itself was peaceful, but, as anticipated, sparked protests and riots that Israeli police had to put down with rubber bullets and tear gas.

The Third intifada?  Since the collapse of the second intifada—a large and sustained Palestinian uprising—in 2005, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict has smoldered. Hamas has launched miniature wars in the Gaza Strip, and Palestinian armed groups and individuals have carried out terrorist attacks in the West Bank, prompting a harsh Israeli military response. Palestinians have resisted in other ways, too—marching, protesting, and throwing rocks. Despite many violent flare-ups, however, both sides have avoided fighting that reaches the scope and scale of the second intifada, even though a negotiated settlement seems more distant than ever.                                    

Fisher specialized in negotiation and conflict management. He was the co-author (with William Ury) of the book Getting to Yes, about "interest-based" negotiation, as well as numerous other publications. After serving in World War II as a weather reconnaissance pilot, Fisher worked on the Marshall Plan in Paris under W. Averell Harriman. After finishing his law degree at Harvard, he worked with the Washington, DC, law firm of Covington & Burling, arguing several cases before the US Supreme Court and advising on several international disputes. He returned to Harvard Law School and became a professor there in 1958. 

On April 4, 1977, President Anwar Sadat and his wife, Jehan, were welcomed to the White House by President and Mrs. Carter. Sadat was assassinated in 1981 by Islamic fundamentalists dissatisfied with Sadat concessions during the peace process. 

Throughout his career, Fisher made significant efforts to seek peace in the Middle East. Among these efforts included his involvement in Sadat's trip to Jerusalem and the Camp David summit that led to an Israeli–Egyptian peace treaty.In this latter case, he helped devise a process called the one-text, where a facilitator shuttled back and forth between the parties, refining a proposed document until it could not satisfy the parties interests more effectively at which point the parties either approve the document or agree to start from scratch. President Carter and Secretary of State Vance created 23 drafts in 13 days before they had a proposal to which both sides could say yes.

                                                 

Carter was not a president who stood up with Israel.  He wrote a book that shocked most of us:   Palestine:  Peace Not Apartheid.  He's very accusatory to Israel in it. Said of the book, "The general parameters of a long-term, two-state agreement are well known, the president writes. "There will be no substantive and permanent peace for any peoples in this troubled region as long as Israel is violating key UN resolutions, official American policy, and the international “road map” for peace by occupying Arab lands and oppressing the Palestinians. Except for mutually agreeable negotiated modifications, Israel’s official pre-1967 borders must be honored. As were all previous administrations since the founding of Israel, US government leaders must be in the forefront of achieving this long-delayed goal of a just agreement that both sides can honor."

Since the publication of former President Jimmy Carter's book, Palestine Peace Not Apartheid, the Carter Center has seen a wave of resignations. More than a dozen people have left in protest, saying the book puts too much blame on Israel. Carter could have been influenced by Fisher's outlook.

Biden’s release of frozen Iranian funds (6 billion) undermines US sanctions worldwide, by Eric Mandel-I just saw him speaking on JBS, interviewed by Shahar Azani.  

The downside is what  Dr. Eric Mandel, American, has noted;  in that most all Americans are not that interested in Israel and really don't understand what's happening. His example was that they didn't even know that Israel didn't have a constitution.   Dr. Eric Mandel is the founder and Director of MEPIN™, the Middle East Political and Information Network™. MEPIN is a private Middle East research analysis read by members of Congress, their foreign policy advisors, members of the Knesset, journalists, and organizational leaders. Dr. Mandel regularly briefs members of Congress and their staffs about the current geo-political situation in the Middle East, and meets with members of the Israeli leadership and their advisors. He is the Northeast Co-Chair of StandWithUs, an international organization dedicated to educating the public about Israel, while fighting the BDS movement (Boycott, Divest and Sanction) against Israel.

No, The case is FOR Israel.  Israel has the right to exist and to not be attacked, which it is constantly. Carter, former Sunday school teacher, and Fisher,  had pre-conceived ideas of Jews to start with, and were very misguided in their judgement if you ask me and (thank G-d), many others.   

Resource:

https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1012115107

https://hls.harvard.edu/today/roger-fisher-1922-2012/

Book:  Defending Israel by Alan M. Dershowitz, p.14-24

Book:  Letters From Israel by Nadene Goldfoot

https://afsc.org/news/quakers-jews-and-israels-bds-blacklist

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roger_Fisher_(academic)#

https://www.npr.org/2007/01/26/7022490/a-key-critics-problem-with-jimmy-carters-book

https://www.jpost.com/opinion/quaker-activists-84222

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Intifada

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Intifada

https://www.foreignaffairs.com/israel/third-intifada-israeli-palestinian-conflict