Showing posts with label Freedom of Speech. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Freedom of Speech. Show all posts

Saturday, May 16, 2026

The British Have a Musical, The Battle of Cable Street, In New York

 Nadene Goldfoot                                                   

Commemorative plaque at Dock Street, close to the Fascist's Tower Hill muster point. Tower Hill, Aldgate, Cable Street and other areas of the East End of London that took place in 1936.

The Battle of Cable Street was a series of clashes that took place at several locations in the East End of London  on Sunday 4 October 1936The British Union of Fascists (BUF), led by Oswald Mosley, announced a march to celebrate the fourth anniversary of their organisation. The BUF had become increasingly anti-Semitic, so their decision to march through East London, then home to a large Jewish population, rather than close to its headquarters in Westminster, which was regarded as a deliberate provocation.

They couldn't or wouldn't ban the march but Jews and others told people to stay away.  

This is similar to the case in the USA where the Nazis decided to march through in order to provoke a Jewish neighborhood full of Holocaust refugees.  I am referring to  the landmark 1970s legal battle often known as the "Skokie Case". In 1977, the National Socialist Party of America (a neo-Nazi group) deliberately planned to march through Skokie, Illinois, a Chicago suburb that was home to tens of thousands of Jewish residents, including thousands of Holocaust survivors.

Back then in 1936 London, the Jews came out and fought with their allied friends, the Irish, against these Fascists.  Unable to clear a route through either Aldgate or Cable Street, and wishing to avoid continued disorder, the Police told Mosley his march through East London could not go ahead, but he was permitted to march to the West End instead. 

Very large numbers of people took part in the events, in part due to the good weather, but estimates of the numbers of participants vary enormously:

  • Estimates of Fascist participants range from 2,000 to 3,000, up to 5,000. This included units of black-bloused female fascists, totalling around 400. The Fascists had a casualty dressing station at their Tower Hill assembly point.
  • There were 6,000–10,000 policemen, including the whole of the Metropolitan Police Mounted Division. The police had wireless vans and a spotter plane sending updates on crowd numbers and movements to Philip Game's HQ, at Tower Hill.
  • Estimates of the number of anti-fascist counter-demonstrators range from 100,000 to 250,000, 300,000, 310,000, and up to 500,000. The Independent Labour Party and Communists, like the Fascists, set up medical stations to treat their injured.

The ILP and Communists made statements celebrating the united response, in which East-Enders of all backgrounds — including Irish Catholics, Jews, dockers and Somali seamen — successfully resisted Mosley and his followers.

East London workers supported by all London in united action have barred the road to Mosley. Gentile, Jew, Catholic, Protestant, Labour and Communist, men, women and children determined that Fascism shall not pass here… East London workers have not only defeated Mosley, they have demonstrated that English people have no time for any sort of toleration for Fascism. East London has torn neutrality to shreds and given a lead to the whole Labour and democratic movement to move into action against Fascism.

  Smart move to actually show the result of Fascism -a teaching aid poster

Every five years there’s a big celebration of the Battle of Cable Street – the iconic clash in the 1930s between fascism and anti-fascism in Britain, which took place in East London.  That day – when the British state was determined to protect free speech and free movement for Oswald Mosley’s deeply antisemitic British Union of fascists – thousands of his foot-soldiers in jackboots and black uniforms were blocked from invading the most highly Jewish-populated East End streets by my favourite prevent strategy of them all: blockades, barricades, and masses of working-class activists working in unison across ethnic and religious divides.



Well now, jump to 2026.  A musical production is simply titled Cable Street. It dramatizes the historical 1936 Battle of Cable Street, when a coalition of 100,000 Jewish, Irish, and working-class protesters united in London to block a march by Oswald Mosley's British Union of Fascists. Written by Tim Gilvin and Alex Kanefsky, the production is currently making its American debut in New York.  It's even made our internet in announcement.  It's running through June 28, 2026.  What a way to introduce our children to history in fighting for the right path in our world.                                          

                                 Frank Collin of NSPA-Leader 1977-see his armband?  

                                                       

Francis Joseph Collin (born November 3, 1944), a convicted child molester in 1979,  is an American former political activist and Midwest coordinator with the American Nazi Party, later known as the National Socialist White People's Party. After being ousted for being partly Jewish (which he denied), in 1970, Collin founded the National Socialist Party of America (NSPA). In the late 1970s, his planned march in the predominantly Jewish suburb of Skokie, Illinois was challenged; the case ultimately reached the United States Supreme Court to correct procedural deficiencies.

This makes it even worse:  Collin was born and raised in Chicago, Illinois, where he attended local schools. His father, Max Frank Collin, was born Max Simon Cohn in Munich, Germany, on August 23, 1913, the son of Jewish parents who were murdered in The Holocaust, and was a survivor of Dachau concentration camp. Frank's mother, Virginia Gertrude née Hardyman, was born in Chicago on August 18, 1920, and was Catholic.   Was that child influenced by his mother or not!!!  Max, survivor's son, must have been a hard to understand father being Frank was in denial of his Jewish inheritance. 


    There was a protest of Nazis marching through in Skokie

Sadly, I see that no one remembers what happened to Jews of Skokie, Illinois when Nazis wanted to march in this Jewish neighborhood of Holocaust survivors.  Who spoke up or cared?  It shows that anti-Semitism had already made its presence known long ago .  In 1936, Skokie, Illinois, was a small, semi-rural village where antisemitism was present as a reflection of broader societal prejudices in the greater Chicago area. While the town itself did not experience organized, localized pogroms, it was a time when the pro-Nazi German-American Bund was actively operating in the region.  So by 1977 few stepped up to the plate;  Jews just sat in their homes remembering things we cannot imagine, frozen in time.  

The big discussion in the 70's was, did the Nazis have the right to march where they wanted-something about free speech or free marching!  Oy vey!!!!!  

The Supreme Court ruled 5–4, per curiam, granting certiorari and reversing and remanding the Illinois Supreme Court's denial to lift the lower court's injunction on the NSPA's march. The ruling dictated that when citizens assert that their speech is being restrained, the matter must be reviewed immediately by the judiciary. By requiring the state court to consider the neo-Nazis' appeal without delay, the Supreme Court decision allowed the National Socialist Party of America to march in Skokie, although they did not do so.

While Collin filed a lawsuit against the city of Chicago for a violation of his First Amendment rights, he realized that his case would be delayed in the courts for far longer than he was willing to wait to begin marching again.

At first, the Skokie mayor and village council intended to allow the NSPA to demonstrate and intended to ignore them in order to afford the NSPA as little publicity as possible. The Jewish community found this tactic unacceptable and held meetings to discuss the matter. The mayor and the village council heard their concerns, and on April 27, 1977, ordered village attorney Harvey Schwartz to seek an injunction.

      Skokie mayor 1977 Brandon Johnson

In addition to filing an injunction, the village of Skokie passed three ordinances on May 2, 1977, in an attempt to prevent all future events similar to that which the NSPA wished to stage. One of the ordinances prohibited wearing military-style uniforms during demonstrations, and the two other ordinances prohibited the distribution of material containing hate speech and required a $350,000 insurance bond to hold a demonstration. These ordinances effectively prevented the NSPA from holding the event!!!

Resource:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Cable_Street#:~:text=The%20Battle%20of%20Cable%20Street,on%20Sunday%204%20October%201936.&text=Commemorative%20plaque%20at%20Dock%20Street,Fascist's%20Tower%20Hill%20muster%20point.

https://www.google.com/search?q=This+is+similar+to+the+case+in+the+USA+where+the+Nazis+decided+to+march+through+in+order+to+provoke+a+Jewish+neighborhood+full+of+Holocaust+refugees.++&sca_esv=97a945c7032fabd4&sxsrf=AN

Thursday, April 20, 2023

La Center, Washington Allowing Nazi flag and Swastika On House-Putting Up With It and Why?

 Nadene Goldfoot                                               


The USA had been slow to get involved with fighting the Nazis in WWII even though Europe was in involved by 1939. We didn't enter until 1941.  Now a community of La Center, Washington has decided not to mix in with the Nazi symbols.  

Hitler accepts the ovation of the Reichstag after announcing 

the "peaceful" acquisition of Austria. Local Identifier: 208-N-

39843, National Archives Identifier: 535792.

I guess no one remembers that we fought a war because this very group.  The freedoms our country gives us really have nothing to do with expressing allowing admiration of Nazis to the point of decorating with Swastikas and flags of the hateful Nazis.    Usually, if one sees a swastika painted on the side of a house, it's done by a Nazi-lover to a Jewish home to identify them as Jews  just to be hateful.  Flying the flag says that this is the domicile of a Nazi center.  They're on the freeway going south from Tacoma just before you get to Vancouver, WA. It's fairly close to Battleground, WA.   


Residents of the tiny town say there is one specific house sending the wrong message to incoming residents and businesses.  “Right now, with the expansion of La Center, we must make a choice about whether or not we will allow the city to be a safe haven for Nazis and Nazi sympathizers,” resident Emily Hancock told the city council during its March 22 meeting.  Hancock said she came to the council meeting representing “a large body of citizens” concerned about an East Dogwood Avenue home with large hand-painted swastikas on the exterior of the house and a World War II Third Reich German flag flying above the home. Property records show the house is owned by longtime La Center resident Donald Soehl.

“The inhabitants of this house are notorious for harassing their neighbors and displaying obscene flags and signs with the intent to intimidate and offend,” Hancock told the council.  " Allowing the graffiti to remain would make existing and potential residents question whether La Center is a welcoming, safe place to live.  “Hate and antisemitism and white supremacy should have no place in La Center,” she said.  Soehl did not return calls for comment.  “Many citizens are under the impression that the city has chosen to do nothing about this because the mayor and city council are in alignment with such anti-semitic values and condone Naziism in La Center,” Hancock said. “We hope that you prove to us that this is not the case.”                

The mayor replied that "  there is little the city can legally do about the swastikas on Soehl’s house."  What?  "We don’t have any legal authority to tell a homeowner what they can or can’t paint on the side of their house,” Cerveny said.  Soehl says the only reason he and his son did it is to upset his neighbors.  Soehl is a senior, certainly old enough to remember personally the 2nd World war.  Emily Hancock, resident, said, " While the right to free speech does include the right to fly swastika flags on private property", she said "the swastika graffiti violates the city’s municipal code and should have required a permit because it is visible from the public right of way."

Bill Link, retired teacher, said "what’s happening in La Center is just a reflection of what’s happening across the country. He just wasn’t expecting to see it here. "  According to a newly released report from the Anti-Defamation League, reports of antisemitic incidents increased by 35 percent over the prior year.  “There’s so much division now. Even with the signage in people’s yards, it’s either something is red or it’s blue. It’s so sad,” Link said.  Interestingly, the article in the Columbian never mentioned that La Center was in Washington.  I imagine they're embarrassed over this, or I should hope so.  

Their City council was urged to take action after Soehl, the homeowner displayed Nazi flag, and symbols, but they're finding excuses instead of taking action.  What's happened to Washington, anyway?  Their pioneers used to be people who  acted, like running off to the gold of Alaska while Oregon pioneers stayed home and farmed.  

Medics helping injured soldier in France, 1944. Local Identifier: 

208-YE-22, National Archives Identifier: 535973.

                                The USA in WWII:  

  • 405,399 USA soldiers died in WWII.  
  • U.S. troops engaged: 16,112,566. from 1941 to 1946, 82 years ago.  
  • American casualties: 291,557.
  • The U.S. joined the Allies (Britain, France, and the USSR) to fight the Axis Powers (Germany, Italy, and Japan) after the U.S. forces were attacked by the Japanese at Pearl Harbor in 1941.
  • One of the most horrific chapters of the war was the Holocaust, the systematic annihilation of about 6 million Jews, as well as millions of others who did not conform to Nazi Germany’s racist ideals.
  • This was the largest and most expensive war ever, as well as the most difficult to settle. The world remained politically unstable, major cities had been turned to rubble by bombings, and modern weapons combined with Germany's attempt to exterminate entire religious and ethnic groups brought death to millions of people.

Resource:  The Columbian:  https://www.columbian.com/news/2023/apr/19/la-center-residents-concerned-over-home-with-swastikas/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_military_casualties_of_war





Monday, March 9, 2015

Freedom of Speech Threatened: New Ruling of Not Criticizing Islam

Nadene Goldfoot                                                                 
2012 OIC Meeting- Hillary Clinton,  Secretary General Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu  born in Cairo, Egypt and now Turkish diploma:    position is for 5 years.  

In the United States, free speech is one of our basic  rights.  That's why it's such a shock to find out that the Obama Administration held a 3 day conference in Washington where Secretary of State Hillary Clinton committed to the key principal  of holding people responsible when "free speech"..."results in sectarian clashes."  

What's going on right under our noses is that since at least 2012, the Obama administration legitimized a ban on criticism.  This is because of a caliphate-planning conference was being held by Muslims which was given a boost of support by the Obama administration by allowing a 3 day "Istanbul Process" conference in Washington.    This even "gave the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) " the political legitimacy it had been seeking to globalize its initiative to ban criticism of Islam."

They held the Caliphate Conference 2012 which was organized by Hizb ut-Tahrir, a political party.  This is a pan-Islamic extremist group founded in 1969  that sought to establish a global Islamic state, or caliphate, ruled by Islamic Sharia Law.           
                                                    The Aim of Hizb ut-Tahrir
Its aim is to resume the Islamic way of life and to convey the Islamic da'wah to the world. This objective means bringing the Muslims back to living an Islamic way of life in Dar al-Islam and in an Islamic society such that all of life's affairs in society are administered according to the Shari'ah rules, and the viewpoint in it is the halal and the haram under the shade of the Islamic State, which is the Khilafah State. That state is the one in which Muslims appoint a Khaleefah and give him the bay'ah to listen and obey on condition that he rules according to the Book of Allah (swt) and the Sunnah of the Messenger of Allah (saw) and on condition that he conveys Islam as a message to the world through da'wah and jihad.
                                                                                      
OIC Secretary General speaking with Catholic Father
The Party, as well, aims at the correct revival of the Ummah through enlightened thought. It also strives to bring her back to her previous might and glory such that she wrests the reins of initiative away from other states and nations, and returns to her rightful place as the first state in the world, as she was in the past, when she governs the world according to the laws of Islam.
It also aims to bring back the Islamic guidance for mankind and to lead the Ummah into a struggle with Kufr, its systems and its thoughts so that Islam encapsulates the world."  
                                                                       
New Secretary Geneal of OIC Mr. Iyad Bin Amin Madani on left of Saudi Arabia as of  January 31, 2014
 57 member states are members of the OIC (The organisation states that it is "the collective voice of the Muslim world") and proposed an international law making it criminal to speak ill of Muhammad or his followers for years.  This came about before the slaughter of French cartoonists by extreme Islamists in January this year.  They took the matter into their own hands after grumbling about it for 10 years and punished by death the people responsible for the cartoon about Muhammad.  "Cartoons of Muhammad, published in a Danish newspaper in September 2005, were found offensive to a number of Muslims. 

The Third Extraordinary Session of the Islamic Summit Conference in December 2005 condemned publication of the cartoons, resulting in broader coverage of the issue by news media in Muslim countries."

Where the idea of not being able to criticize Islam wasn't accepted by many countries outside of the Middle East, somebody came up with Resolution 16/18 for countries to "combat" things like "intolerance, negative stereotyping and stigmatization of...religion and belief."  Too bad it wasn't around when Hitler started his campaign against Jews.  This idea was actually adopted in the UN General Assembly in 2012.  It would remain ineffectual as long as the West didn't jump behind it, it was thought.  

Then Obama held the 3 day conference in Washington with Clinton being committed to the principles.  Such limits on free speech require that the blame be placed on the person speaking if the situation causes someone else to react to it violently.  Hillary's comment that, "It's one thing if people are just disagreeing.  That is fair game.  That's free speech.  But if it results in sectarian clashes, if it results in the destruction or the defacement or the vandalization of religious sites, if it even results in imprisonment or death, then government must hold those who are responsible accountable.  
                                                                     

We in the West are used to" hold those accountable who do violence, not those who make statements that those who do violence blame for their actions."  

 This UN strategy was proposed by Pakistan for the Organization of the Islamic Conference.  The resolution calls for "measures to criminalize" some related behaviors. 
 The aim of the Istanbul Process is to make it a crime to criticize Islam.  
Our American Freedom of Speech is protected by the 1st 
amendment to the US Constitution.  
Talking on the phone

                                                   

Debating about issues
Steven Emerson, a leading authority on Islamic extremist networks, said that party of Hizb ut-Tahrir is the emulation of  the 3 state process that Muslims established the first Islamic caliphate after the death of the Islamic Prophet, Mohammed, in the year 632.  OIC sponsored a symposium in Brussels to talk about "anti-Islamophobia."  Muslim nations would use this law as an endorsement of their attacks on Christians for statements as simple as their belief in the divinity of Jesus Christ, which Muslims consider an affront.  It would be useful for people who would be able to silence dissidents in the countries, like Iran legitimately, being they know how to do it, anyway .  We in the West can't go along with it.

As for Jews and Israel, "There was a meeting in Conakry in 2013. Secretary-General Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu said that foreign ministers would discuss the possibility of cutting ties with any state that recognized Jerusalem as the capital of Israel or that moves its embassy to its environs.  No wonder the USA still refuses to recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel. 

I've noticed how our Administration doesn't allow certain words to be used in reference to Islam.  This is obviously where it has been coming from.  "Jihadists" is not to be used to describe our enemies," said John Brennan, Obama's top counterterrorism advisor who would become      the Director of Central Intelligence (CIA from 2013-2017).   "This is because Jihad is a part of their valid religion."  Obama doesn't want us to say "Radical Islam."  We can say Radical Islamists.  Obama wouldn't use the words, "Islam,"  "Muslim",  and "Jihad," when talking about the Paris killings.
                                                                       
Another young Jewish man murdered 
Young Jewish man murdered in Deli/Supermarket in Paris
  In doing this, he wouldn't recognize that it was an anti-Semitic act when people were being killed in the kosher deli who were there buying their special bread used on Friday night, Challah.  People who were killed in there were Jewish.
                                                                           
Hizb ut Tahrir, who doesn't want a thing said against Islam, is a very active group slandering Jews and Judaism.  They obviously don't practice the Golden Rule of not treating others as you don't want to be treated.  In Australia, Islamist leaders such as Hizb ut Tahrir  were inciting Jihad against Jews to expel them from "Palestine."  I suppose they can't bring themselves to say the word, "Israel."

Jewish leaders demand Islamic Hizb ut-Tahrir teacher be sued for anti-Semitic hate speech.  Sydney Jewish leaders were demanding the head of controversial Islamic group,  Hizb ut-Tahrir, to  be prosecuted under anti-discrimination laws for inciting hatred against Jewish people in a fiery speech last year.  So now they are getting a taste of their own medicine.  

As for the USA, The Global Anti-Semitism Review Act of 2004 (Public Law 108-332, 118 Stat. 1282) was enacted on October 16, 2004. It orders the U.S. State Department to monitor global antisemitism, reporting annually to the United States Congress.  That was signed by George W. Bush.  That's all.  It just gets monitored.  

One of the differences in this is that Jews are only 0.02% of the world population and that WWII tried to kill off all the Jews in the world at that time and that out of 8 million Jews of Europe, they murdered 6 million.  We're an endangered people.  As for Muslims, they are the 2nd largest religion in a world of 7 billion people with 23.4% of the people as of 2010.  At least 1.6 billion people are Muslims whereas Jews have 14 million.  As it stands now, there are more Muslims attacking Jews in Israel and elsewhere than there are Jews attacking Muslims.  In fact, Iran, the 6th largest Muslim majority state, has 76,923,300 people who are 98% Muslims and their government has been most vocal in threatening the lives of Israel and Jews.  .  .  

Iran is a member of OIC.  This is from their website.  "1. Commends the outstanding role of OIC Member States’ mass media in exposing the horrifying war crimes and crimes against humanity committed by the Israeli Zionist regime against the Palestinian people and its efforts to execute the plans of judaizing the city of Al-Quds Al-Shareef; and lauds the role that mass media play in highlighting the legitimate struggle of Palestinians to end the Israeli occupation, we also commend the efforts of Al-Quds Committee."  Yet, OIC states that they work to "safeguard and protect the interests of the Muslim world in the spirit of promoting international peace and harmony."  

I could have guessed that many Muslim states were spreading propaganda against Israel but now see it is done under the organization of OIC as well as the UN.  Never a word, of course, about what the Palestinians have been doing to Israel, like their constant bombing with rockets, missiles and mortars or that Gaza put out civilians in harm's way just to increase false propaganda against the IDF.  They can lie all they want about Jews and Israel but let us dare not speak a word against Islam.  Oh yes.    

Resource: WND http://www.wnd.com/2012/planning-for-islamic-caliphate-to-begin/print/  2/27/2012 by Bob Unruh
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Organisation_of_Islamic_Cooperation
http://www.cnn.com/2015/01/07/world/france-magazine-attack-victims/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_Emerson
http://www.smh.com.au/national/jewish-leaders-demand-islamic-hizb-uttahrir-teacher-be-sued-for-antisemitic-hate-speech-20150309-13zam8.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muslim_world
http://100777.com/node/1026
http://www.hizb-australia.org/hizb-ut-tahrir/about-us
http://www.oicun.org/9/20131213042052911.html
http://www.oicun.org/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_speech_in_the_United_States
http://thedailybanter.com/2015/01/fox-news-npr-wonder-obama-administration-refuses-say-radical-islam/
http://weaselzippers.us/210241-words-not-used-by-obama-to-condemn-paris-terror-attack-islam-muslim-jihad/