Nadene Goldfoot
Coming from Washington Post's opinion writer, Charles Krauthammer, is some interesting news we haven't heard before about the Iranian deal of Democrats Secretary of State John Forbes Kerry and President Barack Hussein Obama.
There have been secret side agreements between Iran and the Atomic Energy Agency concerning past acts and inspections on the Parchin military facility where Iran might have been testing nuclear detonation devices. This administration doesn't have any expectations to learning what the secret agreements were, which should be of #1 in importance. They speak as if this is expected standard practice and is okay.
On Monday, August 3rd, Ali Akbar Velayati, head adviser to the Ayatollah which is a modern-day Haman position, announced that, "Entry into our military sites is absolutely forbidden!" Now, isn't that exactly what we need to do? Especially there?
Charles revealed that this could even allow Iran to do the selecting of soil samples from Parchin to the IAEA. Iran has been seen bulldozing and sanitizing Parchin from up-to-date pictures by satellite cameras. There are no real verification capabilities in this deal.
UPdate: Deputy Foreign Minister, Abbas Araghchi, said Iran will not allow American or Canadian inspectors of the UN nuclear watchdog to visit its nuclear facilities - only monitors from countries with which it has diplomatic relations. Neither would IAEA inspectors have access to "sensitive and military documents."
It's up to the Democrats now in Congress to vote on this Iranian deal which is a mockery. If the congressmen trust Iran and think they will change and turn into a country as fair and friendly as Canada, they will vote for it. If they realize that they are who they are and will not change, and most likely will then be able to carry out their threats to destroy Israel with an atomic missile, they will vote against it.
One leading Democrat has already stated that he will not vote for it, and that is Senator Chuck Schumer, who is slated to replace retiring Senator Harry Reid as the Democrat leader. He studied the deal for 3 weeks and listed his main concern was about inspecting anytime, anywhere inside the Iranian nuclear facilities. He sees that in the first 10 years of the deal there are serious weaknesses in the agreement. That 24 day delay to inspect is most bothersome and not appeased by Obama's explanation that uranium can be detected anytime. That's only part of the problem. Will these die-hard Democrats who follow Obama no matter what be vindictive and not accept Schumer now as head of the Democrats? He's taking a chance to vote with his intelligence and not with his party, an attribute to be much admired in today's world.
However, siding with Obama is the group, J Street, who have placed ads on NBC for one, in 5 states saying that Israel backs the deal and they cite 3 Israelis in agreement. They say they are advocates of Israel, but I have never felt this from them. Instead, I see them trying to control Israel to follow their set of ideas. Jeremy Ben-Ami is the leader, and funded and backed by George Soros, a multi-billionaire. In the USA they have become competitors of AIPAC, who back Israel. J Street shows little respect of Israel's Democratic rights.
How does Israel feel about J Street's interferences? The Israeli Embassy stated that Ambassador Michael Oren would not attend J Street's first national conference because J Street supports positions that may "impair" Israel's interest. Oren has continued his criticism since the conference, telling Conservative rabbis meeting in Philadelphia that J Street "is a unique problem in that it not only opposes one policy of one Israeli government, it opposes all policies of all Israeli governments. It's significantly out of the mainstream." Do you get it? J Street doesn't know how Israel feels about anything and cares less. It's all about how they feel that Israel should feel, and they are not living in Israel!
This ad is a farce, a lie, since the majority of Israelis are as worried as Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is about the deal and are not for it. This is a deal with an outcome that most probably giving Iran the ability to harm Israel, and does not protect it. Of course, first in harm's way is Israel and then it's the USA's turn.
Ahmadinejad's own comment: “Anybody who recognizes Israel will burn in the fire of the Islamic nation's fury”.
Iran has been threatening to destroy this tiny country and all in it. Iran is one of the 3 large countries supplying terrorists such as Hezbollah and Hamas who in turn attack Israel. They are not "with democratic values," they are against them.
Resource: https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/just-who-is-helping-irans-hard-liners/2015/08/06/45700fde-3c75-11e5-8e98-115a3cf7d7ae_story.html
Coming from Washington Post's opinion writer, Charles Krauthammer, is some interesting news we haven't heard before about the Iranian deal of Democrats Secretary of State John Forbes Kerry and President Barack Hussein Obama.
On Monday, August 3rd, Ali Akbar Velayati, head adviser to the Ayatollah which is a modern-day Haman position, announced that, "Entry into our military sites is absolutely forbidden!" Now, isn't that exactly what we need to do? Especially there?
Charles revealed that this could even allow Iran to do the selecting of soil samples from Parchin to the IAEA. Iran has been seen bulldozing and sanitizing Parchin from up-to-date pictures by satellite cameras. There are no real verification capabilities in this deal.
UPdate: Deputy Foreign Minister, Abbas Araghchi, said Iran will not allow American or Canadian inspectors of the UN nuclear watchdog to visit its nuclear facilities - only monitors from countries with which it has diplomatic relations. Neither would IAEA inspectors have access to "sensitive and military documents."
It's up to the Democrats now in Congress to vote on this Iranian deal which is a mockery. If the congressmen trust Iran and think they will change and turn into a country as fair and friendly as Canada, they will vote for it. If they realize that they are who they are and will not change, and most likely will then be able to carry out their threats to destroy Israel with an atomic missile, they will vote against it.
One leading Democrat has already stated that he will not vote for it, and that is Senator Chuck Schumer, who is slated to replace retiring Senator Harry Reid as the Democrat leader. He studied the deal for 3 weeks and listed his main concern was about inspecting anytime, anywhere inside the Iranian nuclear facilities. He sees that in the first 10 years of the deal there are serious weaknesses in the agreement. That 24 day delay to inspect is most bothersome and not appeased by Obama's explanation that uranium can be detected anytime. That's only part of the problem. Will these die-hard Democrats who follow Obama no matter what be vindictive and not accept Schumer now as head of the Democrats? He's taking a chance to vote with his intelligence and not with his party, an attribute to be much admired in today's world.
 |
| Netanyahu and Obama disagree about Iran deal. |
However, siding with Obama is the group, J Street, who have placed ads on NBC for one, in 5 states saying that Israel backs the deal and they cite 3 Israelis in agreement. They say they are advocates of Israel, but I have never felt this from them. Instead, I see them trying to control Israel to follow their set of ideas. Jeremy Ben-Ami is the leader, and funded and backed by George Soros, a multi-billionaire. In the USA they have become competitors of AIPAC, who back Israel. J Street shows little respect of Israel's Democratic rights.
How does Israel feel about J Street's interferences? The Israeli Embassy stated that Ambassador Michael Oren would not attend J Street's first national conference because J Street supports positions that may "impair" Israel's interest. Oren has continued his criticism since the conference, telling Conservative rabbis meeting in Philadelphia that J Street "is a unique problem in that it not only opposes one policy of one Israeli government, it opposes all policies of all Israeli governments. It's significantly out of the mainstream." Do you get it? J Street doesn't know how Israel feels about anything and cares less. It's all about how they feel that Israel should feel, and they are not living in Israel!
This ad is a farce, a lie, since the majority of Israelis are as worried as Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is about the deal and are not for it. This is a deal with an outcome that most probably giving Iran the ability to harm Israel, and does not protect it. Of course, first in harm's way is Israel and then it's the USA's turn.
Ahmadinejad's own comment: “Anybody who recognizes Israel will burn in the fire of the Islamic nation's fury”.
Iran has been threatening to destroy this tiny country and all in it. Iran is one of the 3 large countries supplying terrorists such as Hezbollah and Hamas who in turn attack Israel. They are not "with democratic values," they are against them.
Resource: https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/just-who-is-helping-irans-hard-liners/2015/08/06/45700fde-3c75-11e5-8e98-115a3cf7d7ae_story.html
Jack Rosen, American Jewish Congress on Schumer, JNi.Media https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NJVAIhe57VI
http://www.npr.org/sections/itsallpolitics/2015/08/06/429911872/in-iran-deal-fight-lobbyists-are-spending-millions-to-sway-12-senators
http://jstreet.org/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J_Street
http://www.jpost.com/Opinion/Columnists/Candidly-Speaking-J-Street-is-not-a-pro-Israel-organization-328099
http://observer.com/2015/02/rabbi-shmuley-extracts-apology-from-j-streets-jeremy-ben-ami-on-cnn/
UPdate: debka.com
UPdate: debka.com
