Showing posts with label Oct 7 2023. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Oct 7 2023. Show all posts

Saturday, January 17, 2026

Our Cousin's Bravery, Brigadier General Dan Goldfuss

 Nadene Goldfoot

Our Cousin, Brigadier General Dan Goldfuss

   Sharing with our family and friends about how brave Dan Goldfus was to speak his mind to his peers about October 7, 2023.  I'm so proud of him, and feel he is my icon to follow.  Thank you, my cousin. Hope the writers of this article that I found will understand.  He's a part of our family !                       


Maj.-Gen. Dan Goldfus: The IDF's hero of Khan Yunis and destroyer of Hamas's tunnels

IDF Maj.-Gen. Dan Goldfus considers that his breakthrough in overcoming Hamas’s tunnel warfare is not about a single moment in which he had an epiphany but the result of hard, exhaustive work.  

Dan Goldfuss (Hebrewדן גולדפוס; born December 28, 1976) 50 yrs old,  is an Israeli major general serving as the commander of the IDF Northern Corps and the Multi-Domain Joint Maneuver Array.

He previously served as Commander of Gadsar NahalShayetet 13931st Onyx BattalionNahal Brigade, and The Fire Formation.

Biography

Goldfuss was born and raised in Jerusalem. His parents were South African Jewish immigrants to Israel. He grew up religious but became more secular later in life. He enlisted in the IDF in March 1995, and volunteered for Shayetet 13. He completed the warrior course training in the Shayetet, and took part in the fighting in southern Lebanon, among other things he was part of the rescue force in the Ansariya ambush

He is on our family tree, being a Goldfus/fuss.  I found his position. We started off to my knowledge as Goldfus.   Then his line used Goldfuss-probably depending on where they were living.  Our line anglicized our surname into Goldfoot when in England. 

Based on the context provided in Daniel Gordis’s Israel from the Inside substack from March 15, 2024, the "Goldfus issue" refers to Brigadier General Dan Goldfuswho broke IDF protocol by criticizing the political leadership during a live statement, demanding they be "worthy" of the soldiers fighting in Gaza


FRIDAY (3/15):  We had planned to post about Anita Shapira’s take on Ben-Gurion in times of crisis, but the Goldfus issue is more urgent. We’ll get back to Professor Shapira.

We bow our heads over our resounding failure on October 7(2023), but at the same time we push forward, carry out operations at the highest level of quality, protect our values, and attain many achievements on the battlefield.

Even that opening to Goldfus’ comments, which were apparently not approved in advance by the IDF, was controversial. For in taking full responsibility for the abysmal failures of October 7, he intentionally and wordlessly moved the spotlight to Netanyahu, who has refused to do so.

But if the opening was subtle, what followed was not. Speaking to the government, Goldfus said:

But you, you need need to be worthy of us. You need to be worthy of the soldiers who lost their lives. You need to be worthy of the reservists who don’t care what [political] side they are on, and fought and fight alongside each other.

In a clear smack at the extremists, Smotrich and Ben-Gvir, to whom Bibi is now beholden because he let them into the chicken coop as he constructed his coalition in December 2022, Goldfus said:

From my heart, I ask of you to be together, united, push away the extreme, and adopt the togetherness. Find what unites. We on the battlefield found it, and we will not give up on it.

“Make it worth [it],” Goldfus added in English, noted the Times of Israel.

That’s what we hear every week, every time we bury yet another soldier. Another young soul, often a husband or a father, and certainly a son, likely a sibling. We hear, “We need to be worthy of these sacrifices.”

We say it week in, week out. Even as we know we’re doing nothing of the sort.


Writing on his website, The Madad, Shmuel Rosner captured the mixed feelings of many thoughtful Israelis. In ordinary times, what Goldfus did might well have gotten him fired. But these are not ordinary times, and if there was ever a moment when Israelis need people who will speak truth to power, it is now.

So Goldfus may well get a pass.

Here’s part of what Rosner had to say.

Masthead of the Madad website

Brigadier General Dan Goldfus should be fired, but not in our world

Image
Shmuel Rosner (Photo: X.com)

When a Brigadier General in the IDF turns to the political leadership and says the sentence “You must be worthy of us,” we need to read between the lines. When he calls on them to be worthy, he’s intimating that he thinks they are not worthy.

And of course, he is right: the Israeli political system, with very few exceptions, has not been able to meet a simple task. Get together, get serious, to show calm, show maturity. The warriors bravely stood up, the commanders stood at the head, the generals took responsibility and moved to live on the battlefields. The politicians—at least many of them—continued with politics as normal. … Ben-Gvir makes a play, Dichter flexes a muscle, Sa’ar calls a dramatic press conference. Well, really, that’s what the soldiers were waiting for on the battlefield: for Sa’ar to split from Gantz. Another political show …

The Brigadier General is right. And so is the Chief of Staff who intends to call him in for “clarification”. Because a lieutenant colonel should not tell the political leadership that it is not worthy. And if he said that, he shouldn’t continue to wear a uniform. But Dan Goldfus will probably continue to wear a uniform. The political system cowered at his feet yesterday … Interior Minister Moshe Arbel: “I embrace and embrace every word.” Every word? He just told you that you are not worthy.

Finance Minister Smotrich: “This is not the time for clarifications” [DG - of the sort Halevi was going to call Goldfus in to hear]. Nir Barkat: “His words are accurate.” Is that so, Mr. Barkat? Did you do anything at all to make his words even a bit less accurate?

There is an irony here that one cannot help but note: Israel has no options but to fix failure with other failures. … In a reformed world, the politicians would behave differently. In a reformed world, Goldfus would not have dared to express himself like that. In a reformed world, if he had expressed himself like that, he would have been asked to take off his uniform the next day. But we live in a broken world. It is impossible to punish the outstanding officer, when the failure of his conduct is dwarfed by the failure of which he warned. …

Listen to what he said: “I ask you to be united together, to push the extremism and embrace togetherness.” Now think: who does he mean when he says “extremism”, who is he talking about? Let’s try a guessing game: do you think he means Eisenkot? Moshe Arbel? Yoav Gallant? … Or maybe other politicians, whose names we will not name, because we all know who they are.

And what did Goldfus mean when he said, ”make sure everyone takes part”. Here, this is a question for Finance Minister Smotrich, who is doing everything [DG - by continuing to finance the Haredim] so that not everyone takes part. And this is a question for Prime Minister Netanyahu, who is busy these days concocting a political stew, the goal of which is to save the coalition and reject any move that the ultra-orthodox leadership opposes—that is, to torpedo any move that could trigger a process in the end of which “everyone will have a share” [DG - having the Haredim serve in the army].…

It seems that nothing worked properly in the IDF on October 7th (2023), yet the public trusts the IDF. Why? Because of the patience, modesty, and determination evident on the faces of the commanders. Because they are not busy with PR antics, saving themselves from impeachment or criticism, with assessments by cynics for the investigative committees, or assessments by arch-cynics to prevent the investigative committees.

That’s precisely the problem. And to return to the image we have already used: in a reformed world Goldfus the citizen would be appointed leader, and Goldfus the officer would be asked to resign. In our world one can only dream of Goldfus the leader, and all that remains is to keep Goldfus the officer. 

Let them continue to flatter him, the hypocrites and the schemers.

Resource:

https://goldfoot_genealogy.blogspot.com/2026/01/our-cousin-brigadier-general-dan.html

https://www.blogger.com/blog/post/edit/7896552/6804044900558192509


This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Sunday, July 13, 2025

Two State Solution Pressure Now From Fareed's CNN

 Nadene Goldfoot                                                  

The 2-state solution of Judea/Samaria (West Bank) and Gaza becoming Palestine-run by Hamas?  Who?  Abbas's Palestinian Authority?  This is a forever struggle of power between the two.  By the way, Israel's land constitutes a thin strip of land where their cities lie.  

This morning we were greeted on CNN by Fareed Zakaria's push and pressure to have a two state solution, organized by Trump and Saudi Arabia's Prince attacking the Israeli government into ceding to it.  Then Fareed went into his time with Ukraine and Russia.  Were they a follow-up example of a great two state solution?  Ha!  

 CNN is not the largest news station compared to ABC, CBS, and NBCWhile CNN is a major player in cable news, it is typically outpaced by the broadcast networks (ABC, CBS, and NBC) in overall viewership, particularly in total day and primetime. Fox News also consistently surpasses CNN in viewership among cable news channels, according to TheWrap. For example, in one recent week, Fox News averaged 2.7 million primetime viewers, while NBC had 2.4 million, CBS had 2.4 million, and ABC had 2.3 million, according to Yahoo NewsIn the same period, CNN had its lowest-rated week of the year, according to Yahoo News. 

Nevertheless, CNN is attracted to a high amount of people who watch it faithfully and are swayed by their comments and commentators. Perhaps they only had 2.0 followers. Most likelythey have no idea of the past history of the 2-state solution.

From 2017 to 2021, the bias of CNN's web news shifted significantly, from Center, to Lean Left, to Left. CNN, its employees, and its content are commonly associated with liberal media bias by voices across the political spectrum in the public discourse.

NOTE: This rating is not for CNN's TV/broadcast content, nor its opinion/editorial content. This bias rating reflects the online, written news content available on CNN.com only. AllSides does not rate broadcast content for any outlet. We also provide a separate media bias rating for CNN's Opinion/Editorial content here.

No way, the Palestinians have had a chance to accept a peacetreaty and have sworn never to do this, and they haven't changed; if anything, becoming more avid since Oct 7th 2023. 

Palestinian opposition to Zionist land purchases and the establishment of a Jewish homeland in Palestine began in the 1920s, fueled by concerns about displacement and loss of self-determinationArab leaders and activists voiced their opposition to the Balfour Declaration and the British Mandate, which they saw as undermining their rights and national aspirations. This opposition manifested in various forms, including protests, riots, and ultimately, armed conflict

                          King Faisel of Syria and Iraq,  was all for an Israel and

 hoped the Jews could teach his people a thing or two,but he soon was forced to see how they felt about an Israel.  

 In the 1920s, Faisal I served as the King of both Syria (briefly) and IraqHe was proclaimed King of Syria in 1920, but his reign was short-lived as the French ousted him. He then became King of Iraq in 1921, a position he held until his death in 1933. 

Israel was attacked during War of Independence 1947-1949,1956, 1967, 1973, 1982...by their neighbors.....

                                            

       Arab League Summit on August 29 to September 1, 1967:  

Left to right: Faisal of Saudi ArabiaNasser of EgyptSallal of YemenSabah of Kuwait
 and Arif of Iraq
8 heads of State attended;
Egypt (United Arab Republic) , Yemen, Kuwait, Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Lebanon, Sudan, and Jordan



Following the Six-Day War in June 1967, the Arab League held a summit in Khartoum, Sudan, from August 29 to September 1, 1967. This meeting is known as the Khartoum Resolution or the Three No's of Khartoum. 
The final communique of the meeting "underscored the Palestinians' right to regain the whole of Palestine—that is, to destroy the State of Israel." The outcome of this summit influenced Israeli foreign policy for decades. 
     Chaim Weizmann and Faisel, together at Paris meetings in agreement
What makes me sad is how Faisal changed sides utterly !  That's a bad example in trust for Israel.  
Eight Arab heads of state attended the Khartoum Conference in 1967. The summit, which took place from August 29 to September 1, was convened in the wake of the Six-Day War. The conference resulted in the Khartoum Resolution, which outlined the Arab world's response to the conflict. 
The resolution articulated the Arab world's official stance towards Israel at that time, and the "three no's" famously declared:
  • No peace with Israel
  • No recognition of Israel
  • No negotiations with Israel 
The Khartoum Resolution represented a hardening of the Arab position towards Israel after the Six-Day War and significantly influenced Israeli foreign policy for decades. It was a clear rejection of any immediate peace settlement with Israel. This stance was maintained by most Arab states for over a decade, until Egypt signed a peace treaty with Israel in 197912 years after the Khartoum Conference.  . 
The West can hope for a resolution to the 2-state solution tillKingdom Comes, and it won't do any good.  It hasn't changedthose attending this meeting to change and take back theirsworn statement of No No No.  October 7, 2023 just shows how adament they still are.  Only those involved with theAbraham Accords have seen the light and have changed;  andmaybe they weren't involved then.  I only hold out the changewith the city of Hebron and its younger Sheik who sees life canbe better not under the PA, but Israel

.  
Fareed Rafiq Zakaria is an Indian-born American journalist, political commentator, and author. He is the host of CNN's Fareed Zakaria GPS and writes a weekly paid column for The Washington Post. He has been a columnist for Newsweek, editor of Newsweek International, and an editor at large of Time.
There have been several proposals and negotiations since 1967 where the possibility of Palestinian land for a two-state solution was discussed. 
Here's a timeline of some key instances:
  • 1993 Oslo Accords: This agreement aimed to create a framework for future negotiations towards Palestinian statehood and established the Palestinian Authority. However, it did not finalize borders.
  • 2000 Camp David Summit: A plan for a Palestinian state in most of the Judea/Sameria (West Bank) and Gaza Strip with East Jerusalem as its capital was proposed but not accepted.
  • 2001 Taba Summit: Negotiations based on the Clinton parameters took place, and the Israeli negotiation team presented a map which the Palestinian side accepted as a basis for further negotiation. However, talks ended without a final agreement.
  • 2007 Annapolis Conference: This conference aimed to reach a peace agreement leading to a Palestinian state. An "unprecedented offer" based on the pre-1967 borders, including land swaps and a divided Jerusalem, was reportedly offered, but talks did not yield a final agreement.
  • No, they wanted all;  all of Israel including Jerusalem, probably;  that's the problem.  
  • 2010 negotiations: The principle of land swap was discussed, though the ratio remained a point of disagreement. The Palestinian Authority requested that Israel cease settlement building and accept the 1967 borders as the basis for a two-state solution. Israel acknowledged the right of Palestinians to their own state, with the condition it be demilitarized.
  • 2020 "Peace to Prosperity" Plan: This US plan presented a vision for a two-state solution but included provisions for Israeli sovereignty over some Judea/Samaria (West Bank) settlements and land swaps. It was largely rejected by the Palestinians and drew criticism. 
March 5, 2025:  Trump's Gaza Plan:  U.S. President Donald Trump has proposed that the United States "take over" and "own" the Gaza Strip, suggesting long-term control after the ongoing conflict. His statement came during a press conference with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at the White House on February 4, where Trump emphasized the need for a new approach to Gaza's future. 

Since his announcement, Trump and his administration have sent mixed signals about the plan. On February 5, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt assured reporters that Palestinian displacement would be “temporary” and that no U.S. troops or tax dollars would be involved in Gaza. However, in a February 10 Fox News interview, Trump appeared to contradict this, stating that Palestinians would not return to Gaza because “they’re going to have much better housing... a permanent place for them.”  (Maybe Greenland?)

Despite these instances, the exact details of land distribution and a final settlement have remained points of contention, preventing the establishment of an independent Palestinian state based on the 1967 borders. 
Sorry, but October 7, 2023has really turned everyone with intelligence against the ideaof placing people mad; with hatred against Jews (thus Israelis)next door to Arabs is after killing over a thousand and kidnapp-ing a few hundred others to torture and victimize as hostagesgood only for saving their own skin.  
Now the WEST thinks they can plan and control land that has been in Jewish hands for the past 4,000 years and reallymeans nothing to them except land involved with theirChristian religion?  Or is it future land deals?  

They want to wipe Israel off the map?  It may be small, too smallfor them to matter, but Israel is the bastion of the greatnessof a Democracy, the freedom of using one's creativity.  Israelcontinues to show how the USA should be copied by others. That's the fear for China and Russia;  people will figure outways of living not connected to them, and then they lose their hold.   

Resource:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faisal_I

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khartoum_Resolution