Nadene Goldfoot
Parchin is a well known military complex in Iran just southeast of Tehran, the capital. Many believe that it's possible there has been nuclear material being tested there as weapons by the Iranians. It's off limits to inspection in this Iran deal.
Why do they suspect something has been going on? When Hillary Rodham Clinton was Secretary of State back in 2011, November found the International Atomic Energy Agency report (IAEA) revealing satellite imagery of some structures and chambers or some kind of vessels. This indicated that Iran had conducted many activities consistent with nuclear blast assessments. Evidently Hillary did not act on this report.
Now, a confidential IAEA report was issued just yesterday, on August 27th which Reuters got a hold of. It said, "Since our previous report in May at a particular location at the Parchin side, the agency has continued to observe, through satellite imagery, the presence of vehicles, equipment, and probable construction materials. In addition, a small extension to an existing building" appeared to have been built.
John Kerry became Secretary of State on February 1, 2013. He has already determined or decided that no such activity has taken place and we are not to worry. Why not worry? Why hasn't he inquired and checked it out? Obama has been president since 2009. Shouldn't he have looked into this matter? Especially with us having to trust Iran in this Iran deal?
Netanyahu's important warning to the world of their intentions and closeness to achieving their goals was made at the United Nations in 2012 when Hillary was Secretary of State. People laughed at him because he had been warning for some years already, but this time their preparedness was dangerously close. He knew that their complex was immense, too much for Israel to take out as they had done to Syria and Iraq previously. Israel needed the assistance of the USA to carry out such an attack to stop their development of an atomic bomb. Instead, Netanyahu has been told that the USA will shoot down any Israeli plane on the way to go it alone. Some friend!!!
This latest IAEA report was part of the IAEA's inquiry into Iran's past nuclear activity as to any military aspects. This type of fact is called PMD's. They were a part of the IAEA concern and discussion leading up to the July 14th Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action which was signed by the USA and member nations of the P5+1; that is China, France, Russia, UK, USA and Germany.
UN inspectors last visited Parchin in 2005! The fact is, that the IAEA says that any activities Iran has had at Parchin since the UN visited Parchin could jeopardize its ability to verify Western intelligence. This suggests that Tehran has carried out tests there that are relevant to nuclear bomb detonations more than a decade ago.
Iran says they are making it up, just like they refuse to believe that the Holocaust against Jews happened during WWII. When they are in denial, you must understand they do not accept reality but are living in their own little bubble. Then why did their military need this huge cylinder and concrete shield for? This is something used in testing reactions from atomic weapons.
"Oh, this is just a military site," they say. "It's not a nuclear site." IAEA has no restrictions on their building there.
Spokesman John Kirby who was just appointed May 13, 2015, former spokesperson for Admiral Mike Mullen and then Chief of Information for the Navy, has represented the position of the State Department and he has declared that it's just a military site DESPITE EARLIER REPORTS BY THE IAEA AND BELIEVED BY MANY ANALYSTS. HE, WHO IS NOT AN INSPECTOR OF SUCH SITES SO HAS NO SCIENTIFIC TRAINING TO DO SO, SAYS THERE WAS NO PMD ACTIVITY THERE AT ALL!
What if Netanyahu was right? What if they've been testing out the equipment? After all, they've been working non-stop for the past 2 years. This site wasn't closed down. In fact, they've been working 24/7 for years, now, only slowed down by viruses. These mad scientists are doing all they can to develop the action they need on the tip of their missiles.
The shock of all this is that Parchin, a military site, will be inspected by the Iranians themselves!!! And we fell for that!!!
Update: 1:00pm from Israel embassy:
Resource: http://www.jewishpress.com/news/breaking-news/state-dept-spox-no-worries-parchin-has-no-nuclear-dimensions/2015/08/28/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P5%2B1
http://www.state.gov/secretary/remarks/2015/05/242234.htm
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/22/world/middleeast/prospect-of-self-inspections-by-iran-feeds-opposition-to-nuclear-deal.html?_r=0
http://unitedwithisrael.org/watch-us-denies-that-irans-parchin-is-a-nuclear-site/?utm_source=MadMimi&utm_medium=email&utm_content=US+Denies+Iran%27s+Parchin+is+%27Nuclear%27%3B+200+US+Military+Leaders+Oppose+Iran+Deal&utm_campaign=20150828_m127128158_US+Denies+Iran%27s+Parchin+is+Nuclear%3B+200+US+Military+Leaders+Oppose+Iran+Deal&utm_term=Parchin-site-Iran-249x169_jpg
Parchin is a well known military complex in Iran just southeast of Tehran, the capital. Many believe that it's possible there has been nuclear material being tested there as weapons by the Iranians. It's off limits to inspection in this Iran deal.
 |
| Iranians burning Israeli flag at recent rally |
Now, a confidential IAEA report was issued just yesterday, on August 27th which Reuters got a hold of. It said, "Since our previous report in May at a particular location at the Parchin side, the agency has continued to observe, through satellite imagery, the presence of vehicles, equipment, and probable construction materials. In addition, a small extension to an existing building" appeared to have been built.
John Kerry became Secretary of State on February 1, 2013. He has already determined or decided that no such activity has taken place and we are not to worry. Why not worry? Why hasn't he inquired and checked it out? Obama has been president since 2009. Shouldn't he have looked into this matter? Especially with us having to trust Iran in this Iran deal?
Netanyahu's important warning to the world of their intentions and closeness to achieving their goals was made at the United Nations in 2012 when Hillary was Secretary of State. People laughed at him because he had been warning for some years already, but this time their preparedness was dangerously close. He knew that their complex was immense, too much for Israel to take out as they had done to Syria and Iraq previously. Israel needed the assistance of the USA to carry out such an attack to stop their development of an atomic bomb. Instead, Netanyahu has been told that the USA will shoot down any Israeli plane on the way to go it alone. Some friend!!!
This latest IAEA report was part of the IAEA's inquiry into Iran's past nuclear activity as to any military aspects. This type of fact is called PMD's. They were a part of the IAEA concern and discussion leading up to the July 14th Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action which was signed by the USA and member nations of the P5+1; that is China, France, Russia, UK, USA and Germany.
UN inspectors last visited Parchin in 2005! The fact is, that the IAEA says that any activities Iran has had at Parchin since the UN visited Parchin could jeopardize its ability to verify Western intelligence. This suggests that Tehran has carried out tests there that are relevant to nuclear bomb detonations more than a decade ago.
 |
| .. Building of the massive cylinder and concrete shield by Tamara Patton (http://guests.armscontrolwonk.com/archive/3288/the-many-dimensions-of-parchin-3) |
Iran says they are making it up, just like they refuse to believe that the Holocaust against Jews happened during WWII. When they are in denial, you must understand they do not accept reality but are living in their own little bubble. Then why did their military need this huge cylinder and concrete shield for? This is something used in testing reactions from atomic weapons.
"Oh, this is just a military site," they say. "It's not a nuclear site." IAEA has no restrictions on their building there.
Spokesman John Kirby who was just appointed May 13, 2015, former spokesperson for Admiral Mike Mullen and then Chief of Information for the Navy, has represented the position of the State Department and he has declared that it's just a military site DESPITE EARLIER REPORTS BY THE IAEA AND BELIEVED BY MANY ANALYSTS. HE, WHO IS NOT AN INSPECTOR OF SUCH SITES SO HAS NO SCIENTIFIC TRAINING TO DO SO, SAYS THERE WAS NO PMD ACTIVITY THERE AT ALL!
What if Netanyahu was right? What if they've been testing out the equipment? After all, they've been working non-stop for the past 2 years. This site wasn't closed down. In fact, they've been working 24/7 for years, now, only slowed down by viruses. These mad scientists are doing all they can to develop the action they need on the tip of their missiles.
The shock of all this is that Parchin, a military site, will be inspected by the Iranians themselves!!! And we fell for that!!!
 |
| Iran's long distance rocket, Fajr 5 |
Update: 1:00pm from Israel embassy:
If the international community wants to avoid
war, it's crucial to get a better deal. A better deal can be achieved by
returning to what brought Iran to the negotiating table in the first place:
economic pressure coupled with a credible military option. That’s the real
alternative. This better deal would:
|
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P5%2B1
http://www.state.gov/secretary/remarks/2015/05/242234.htm
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/22/world/middleeast/prospect-of-self-inspections-by-iran-feeds-opposition-to-nuclear-deal.html?_r=0
http://unitedwithisrael.org/watch-us-denies-that-irans-parchin-is-a-nuclear-site/?utm_source=MadMimi&utm_medium=email&utm_content=US+Denies+Iran%27s+Parchin+is+%27Nuclear%27%3B+200+US+Military+Leaders+Oppose+Iran+Deal&utm_campaign=20150828_m127128158_US+Denies+Iran%27s+Parchin+is+Nuclear%3B+200+US+Military+Leaders+Oppose+Iran+Deal&utm_term=Parchin-site-Iran-249x169_jpg
http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/6401/nato-iran-israel
ReplyDeleteon the brink
It sure looks that way. What gets me angry is that our government does not see it, either that or it's okay with them. They seem to be supporting Iran more than Israel and even the USA interests. How can they let Iran have all these rights? Their diplomacy was shockingly weak. Why isn't the USA in an uproar over it except for a few people? Well, we'll see what happens on September 17th when they vote. Be sure to call your Senators' offices and tell them to vote NO.
ReplyDeleteTo vote against the Iran deal: Call Ron Wyden 1-202-224-5244 and
Jeff Merkley 1-202-224-3753
and also email them-address below. I just did both. The vote is on the 17th, I believe.
Dear Senator:
The ramifications of a yes vote has far worse implications than a no vote. There will be more harm done. The proposed deal does not ensure "anytime, anywhere" short-notice inspections as we had expected and must happen.
The deal doesn't clearly condition sanctions relief on full Iranian cooperation in satisfying International Atomic Energy Agency concerns over the possible military dimensions of Tehran's program.
The deal lifts sanctions as soon as the agreement commences, instead of a gradual lift conditioned on Iran's demonstrations of continued following of the agreement.
The deal lifts key restrictions in as few as 8 years.
The deal would disconnect and store centrifuges in an easily reversible manner, but it requires no dismantlement of centrifuges or any Iranian nuclear facility.
This puts Israel in harm's way with a definite expectation of being hit with a missile with a nuclear warhead.
This is not the deal put forth to the American public when first talked about. It has given away every item needed for security for both Israel and the USA, as Iran calls us, the big Satan and the little Satan.
Iran is supplying weapons for all the terrorists in the Middle East. Why are we cow-towing to them?
http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm?State=OR
i have made email contact, nadene. we will have to see what they do with this issue. i won't be holding my breath waiting for them to do the right thing. :(
ReplyDeleteGood for you! They won't unless tons of people write in about it to their congressmen. Obama already has enough Senator votes and hardly has to wait for an official Sept 17th vote, as far as I can see unless they change their minds, which I doubt. It's easier to remain blind to all the problems.
ReplyDelete