Nadene Goldfoot
In the United States, free speech is one of our basic rights. That's why it's such a shock to find out that the Obama Administration held a 3 day conference in Washington where Secretary of State Hillary Clinton committed to the key principal of holding people responsible when "free speech"..."results in sectarian clashes."
What's going on right under our noses is that since at least 2012, the Obama administration legitimized a ban on criticism. This is because of a caliphate-planning conference was being held by Muslims which was given a boost of support by the Obama administration by allowing a 3 day "Istanbul Process" conference in Washington. This even "gave the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) " the political legitimacy it had been seeking to globalize its initiative to ban criticism of Islam."
They held the Caliphate Conference 2012 which was organized by Hizb ut-Tahrir, a political party. This is a pan-Islamic extremist group founded in 1969 that sought to establish a global Islamic state, or caliphate, ruled by Islamic Sharia Law.
The Aim of Hizb ut-Tahrir
57 member states are members of the OIC (The organisation states that it is "the collective voice of the Muslim world") and proposed an international law making it criminal to speak ill of Muhammad or his followers for years. This came about before the slaughter of French cartoonists by extreme Islamists in January this year. They took the matter into their own hands after grumbling about it for 10 years and punished by death the people responsible for the cartoon about Muhammad. "Cartoons of Muhammad, published in a Danish newspaper in September 2005, were found offensive to a number of Muslims.
The Third Extraordinary Session of the Islamic Summit Conference in December 2005 condemned publication of the cartoons, resulting in broader coverage of the issue by news media in Muslim countries."
Where the idea of not being able to criticize Islam wasn't accepted by many countries outside of the Middle East, somebody came up with Resolution 16/18 for countries to "combat" things like "intolerance, negative stereotyping and stigmatization of...religion and belief." Too bad it wasn't around when Hitler started his campaign against Jews. This idea was actually adopted in the UN General Assembly in 2012. It would remain ineffectual as long as the West didn't jump behind it, it was thought.
Then Obama held the 3 day conference in Washington with Clinton being committed to the principles. Such limits on free speech require that the blame be placed on the person speaking if the situation causes someone else to react to it violently. Hillary's comment that, "It's one thing if people are just disagreeing. That is fair game. That's free speech. But if it results in sectarian clashes, if it results in the destruction or the defacement or the vandalization of religious sites, if it even results in imprisonment or death, then government must hold those who are responsible accountable.
Steven Emerson, a leading authority on Islamic extremist networks, said that party of Hizb ut-Tahrir is the emulation of the 3 state process that Muslims established the first Islamic caliphate after the death of the Islamic Prophet, Mohammed, in the year 632. OIC sponsored a symposium in Brussels to talk about "anti-Islamophobia." Muslim nations would use this law as an endorsement of their attacks on Christians for statements as simple as their belief in the divinity of Jesus Christ, which Muslims consider an affront. It would be useful for people who would be able to silence dissidents in the countries, like Iran legitimately, being they know how to do it, anyway . We in the West can't go along with it.
As for Jews and Israel, "There was a meeting in Conakry in 2013. Secretary-General Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu said that foreign ministers would discuss the possibility of cutting ties with any state that recognized Jerusalem as the capital of Israel or that moves its embassy to its environs. No wonder the USA still refuses to recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel.
I've noticed how our Administration doesn't allow certain words to be used in reference to Islam. This is obviously where it has been coming from. "Jihadists" is not to be used to describe our enemies," said John Brennan, Obama's top counterterrorism advisor who would become the Director of Central Intelligence (CIA from 2013-2017). "This is because Jihad is a part of their valid religion." Obama doesn't want us to say "Radical Islam." We can say Radical Islamists. Obama wouldn't use the words, "Islam," "Muslim", and "Jihad," when talking about the Paris killings.
In doing this, he wouldn't recognize that it was an anti-Semitic act when people were being killed in the kosher deli who were there buying their special bread used on Friday night, Challah. People who were killed in there were Jewish.
Hizb ut Tahrir, who doesn't want a thing said against Islam, is a very active group slandering Jews and Judaism. They obviously don't practice the Golden Rule of not treating others as you don't want to be treated. In Australia, Islamist leaders such as Hizb ut Tahrir were inciting Jihad against Jews to expel them from "Palestine." I suppose they can't bring themselves to say the word, "Israel."
Resource: WND http://www.wnd.com/2012/planning-for-islamic-caliphate-to-begin/print/ 2/27/2012 by Bob Unruh
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Organisation_of_Islamic_Cooperation
http://www.cnn.com/2015/01/07/world/france-magazine-attack-victims/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_Emerson
http://www.smh.com.au/national/jewish-leaders-demand-islamic-hizb-uttahrir-teacher-be-sued-for-antisemitic-hate-speech-20150309-13zam8.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muslim_world
http://100777.com/node/1026
http://www.hizb-australia.org/hizb-ut-tahrir/about-us
http://www.oicun.org/9/20131213042052911.html
http://www.oicun.org/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_speech_in_the_United_States
http://thedailybanter.com/2015/01/fox-news-npr-wonder-obama-administration-refuses-say-radical-islam/
http://weaselzippers.us/210241-words-not-used-by-obama-to-condemn-paris-terror-attack-islam-muslim-jihad/
 |
| 2012 OIC Meeting- Hillary Clinton, Secretary General Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu born in Cairo, Egypt and now Turkish diploma: position is for 5 years. |
In the United States, free speech is one of our basic rights. That's why it's such a shock to find out that the Obama Administration held a 3 day conference in Washington where Secretary of State Hillary Clinton committed to the key principal of holding people responsible when "free speech"..."results in sectarian clashes."
What's going on right under our noses is that since at least 2012, the Obama administration legitimized a ban on criticism. This is because of a caliphate-planning conference was being held by Muslims which was given a boost of support by the Obama administration by allowing a 3 day "Istanbul Process" conference in Washington. This even "gave the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) " the political legitimacy it had been seeking to globalize its initiative to ban criticism of Islam."
They held the Caliphate Conference 2012 which was organized by Hizb ut-Tahrir, a political party. This is a pan-Islamic extremist group founded in 1969 that sought to establish a global Islamic state, or caliphate, ruled by Islamic Sharia Law.
The Aim of Hizb ut-Tahrir
Its aim is to resume the Islamic way of life and to convey the Islamic da'wah to the world. This objective means bringing the Muslims back to living an Islamic way of life in Dar al-Islam and in an Islamic society such that all of life's affairs in society are administered according to the Shari'ah rules, and the viewpoint in it is the halal and the haram under the shade of the Islamic State, which is the Khilafah State. That state is the one in which Muslims appoint a Khaleefah and give him the bay'ah to listen and obey on condition that he rules according to the Book of Allah (swt) and the Sunnah of the Messenger of Allah (saw) and on condition that he conveys Islam as a message to the world through da'wah and jihad.
 |
| OIC Secretary General speaking with Catholic Father |
The Party, as well, aims at the correct revival of the Ummah through enlightened thought. It also strives to bring her back to her previous might and glory such that she wrests the reins of initiative away from other states and nations, and returns to her rightful place as the first state in the world, as she was in the past, when she governs the world according to the laws of Islam.
It also aims to bring back the Islamic guidance for mankind and to lead the Ummah into a struggle with Kufr, its systems and its thoughts so that Islam encapsulates the world."  |
| New Secretary Geneal of OIC Mr. Iyad Bin Amin Madani on left of Saudi Arabia as of January 31, 2014 |
The Third Extraordinary Session of the Islamic Summit Conference in December 2005 condemned publication of the cartoons, resulting in broader coverage of the issue by news media in Muslim countries."
Where the idea of not being able to criticize Islam wasn't accepted by many countries outside of the Middle East, somebody came up with Resolution 16/18 for countries to "combat" things like "intolerance, negative stereotyping and stigmatization of...religion and belief." Too bad it wasn't around when Hitler started his campaign against Jews. This idea was actually adopted in the UN General Assembly in 2012. It would remain ineffectual as long as the West didn't jump behind it, it was thought.
Then Obama held the 3 day conference in Washington with Clinton being committed to the principles. Such limits on free speech require that the blame be placed on the person speaking if the situation causes someone else to react to it violently. Hillary's comment that, "It's one thing if people are just disagreeing. That is fair game. That's free speech. But if it results in sectarian clashes, if it results in the destruction or the defacement or the vandalization of religious sites, if it even results in imprisonment or death, then government must hold those who are responsible accountable.
We in the West are used to" hold those accountable who do violence, not those who make statements that those who do violence blame for their actions."
This UN strategy was proposed by Pakistan for the Organization of the Islamic Conference. The resolution calls for "measures to criminalize" some related behaviors.
The aim of the Istanbul Process is to make it a crime to criticize Islam.
Our American Freedom of Speech is protected by the 1st
amendment to the US Constitution.
 |
| Talking on the phone |
 |
| Debating about issues |
As for Jews and Israel, "There was a meeting in Conakry in 2013. Secretary-General Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu said that foreign ministers would discuss the possibility of cutting ties with any state that recognized Jerusalem as the capital of Israel or that moves its embassy to its environs. No wonder the USA still refuses to recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel.
I've noticed how our Administration doesn't allow certain words to be used in reference to Islam. This is obviously where it has been coming from. "Jihadists" is not to be used to describe our enemies," said John Brennan, Obama's top counterterrorism advisor who would become the Director of Central Intelligence (CIA from 2013-2017). "This is because Jihad is a part of their valid religion." Obama doesn't want us to say "Radical Islam." We can say Radical Islamists. Obama wouldn't use the words, "Islam," "Muslim", and "Jihad," when talking about the Paris killings.
 |
| Another young Jewish man murdered |
 |
| Young Jewish man murdered in Deli/Supermarket in Paris |
Hizb ut Tahrir, who doesn't want a thing said against Islam, is a very active group slandering Jews and Judaism. They obviously don't practice the Golden Rule of not treating others as you don't want to be treated. In Australia, Islamist leaders such as Hizb ut Tahrir were inciting Jihad against Jews to expel them from "Palestine." I suppose they can't bring themselves to say the word, "Israel."
Jewish leaders demand Islamic Hizb ut-Tahrir teacher be sued for anti-Semitic hate speech. Sydney Jewish leaders were demanding the head of controversial Islamic group, Hizb ut-Tahrir, to be prosecuted under anti-discrimination laws for inciting hatred against Jewish people in a fiery speech last year. So now they are getting a taste of their own medicine.
As for the USA, The Global Anti-Semitism Review Act of 2004 (Public Law 108-332, 118 Stat. 1282) was enacted on October 16, 2004. It orders the U.S. State Department to monitor global antisemitism, reporting annually to the United States Congress. That was signed by George W. Bush. That's all. It just gets monitored.
One of the differences in this is that Jews are only 0.02% of the world population and that WWII tried to kill off all the Jews in the world at that time and that out of 8 million Jews of Europe, they murdered 6 million. We're an endangered people. As for Muslims, they are the 2nd largest religion in a world of 7 billion people with 23.4% of the people as of 2010. At least 1.6 billion people are Muslims whereas Jews have 14 million. As it stands now, there are more Muslims attacking Jews in Israel and elsewhere than there are Jews attacking Muslims. In fact, Iran, the 6th largest Muslim majority state, has 76,923,300 people who are 98% Muslims and their government has been most vocal in threatening the lives of Israel and Jews. . .
Iran is a member of OIC. This is from their website. "1. Commends the outstanding role of OIC Member States’ mass
media in exposing the horrifying war crimes and crimes against
humanity committed by the Israeli Zionist regime against the
Palestinian people and its efforts to execute the plans of
judaizing the city of Al-Quds Al-Shareef; and lauds the role that
mass media play in highlighting the legitimate struggle of
Palestinians to end the Israeli occupation, we also commend the
efforts of Al-Quds Committee." Yet, OIC states that they work to "safeguard and protect the interests of the Muslim world in the spirit of promoting international peace and harmony."
I could have guessed that many Muslim states were spreading propaganda against Israel but now see it is done under the organization of OIC as well as the UN. Never a word, of course, about what the Palestinians have been doing to Israel, like their constant bombing with rockets, missiles and mortars or that Gaza put out civilians in harm's way just to increase false propaganda against the IDF. They can lie all they want about Jews and Israel but let us dare not speak a word against Islam. Oh yes.
Resource: WND http://www.wnd.com/2012/planning-for-islamic-caliphate-to-begin/print/ 2/27/2012 by Bob Unruh
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Organisation_of_Islamic_Cooperation
http://www.cnn.com/2015/01/07/world/france-magazine-attack-victims/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_Emerson
http://www.smh.com.au/national/jewish-leaders-demand-islamic-hizb-uttahrir-teacher-be-sued-for-antisemitic-hate-speech-20150309-13zam8.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muslim_world
http://100777.com/node/1026
http://www.hizb-australia.org/hizb-ut-tahrir/about-us
http://www.oicun.org/9/20131213042052911.html
http://www.oicun.org/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_speech_in_the_United_States
http://thedailybanter.com/2015/01/fox-news-npr-wonder-obama-administration-refuses-say-radical-islam/
http://weaselzippers.us/210241-words-not-used-by-obama-to-condemn-paris-terror-attack-islam-muslim-jihad/
ReplyDelete"I could have guessed that many Muslim states were spreading propaganda against Israel but now see it is done under the organization of OIC as well as the UN. Never a word, of course, about what the Palestinians have been doing to Israel, like their constant bombing with rockets, missiles and mortars or that Gaza put out civilians in harm's way just to increase false propaganda against the IDF. They can lie all they want about Jews and Israel but let us dare not speak a word against Islam. Oh yes."
john brennan is a muslim convert right? (helping to get the "job" done here in america too isn't he?)
According to Snopes, there is no adequate proof that he is a Muslim. I found that he attended American University in Cairo, and he was stationed in Saudi Arabia. http://www.snopes.com/politics/religion/brennan.asp When he was sworn in he did not use the bible but the constitution.
DeleteAccording to Snopes, there is no adequate proof that he is a Muslim. I found that he attended American University in Cairo, and he was stationed in Saudi Arabia. http://www.snopes.com/politics/religion/brennan.asp When he was sworn in he did not use the bible but the constitution.
Deletehttp://freedomoutpost.com/2014/09/john-brennan-obamas-muslim-convert-stooge-jihad/
ReplyDeleteenough for me to say yes. he is a muslim convert. the foxes are in the henhouse...
One does wonder. Sometimes I think Snopes doesn't snoop enough. What I see is the whole administration having leanings that a way, especially after what I uncovered in this article.
DeleteOne does wonder. Sometimes I think Snopes doesn't snoop enough. What I see is the whole administration having leanings that a way, especially after what I uncovered in this article.
Delete